You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
See WP2533_r107133, which has for three genes a Uniprot ID pointing towards an incorrect species (2x Arabidopsis thaliana and 1x Saccharomyces cerevisiae) compared to the species for the PW (Homo sapiens).
In the RDF, mappings to Ensembl exist, which didn't start with "ENSG" (the code for Human IDs).
These mappings are not in the website linkouts, this uses the API and filters on species, where the RDF uses all mapping files simultaneously.
So we could use this additional mapping to our advantage, to track species which start with the wrong Ensembl code for the species of the PW.
I'll fix the three IDs above, but it would be good to make a Unit test out of this I believe.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See WP2533_r107133, which has for three genes a Uniprot ID pointing towards an incorrect species (2x Arabidopsis thaliana and 1x Saccharomyces cerevisiae) compared to the species for the PW (Homo sapiens).
In the RDF, mappings to Ensembl exist, which didn't start with "ENSG" (the code for Human IDs).
These mappings are not in the website linkouts, this uses the API and filters on species, where the RDF uses all mapping files simultaneously.
So we could use this additional mapping to our advantage, to track species which start with the wrong Ensembl code for the species of the PW.
I'll fix the three IDs above, but it would be good to make a Unit test out of this I believe.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: