We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review Draft publication goes relatively well (though see #348) as per https://github.com/whatwg/meta/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.md#review-drafts. One problem is recovering from build failures.
When hitting a build failure my current process is something like this:
review.sh
git checkout main
chmod 755 review.sh
Step 1 is always needed. Ideally step 2 through 7 would be replaced by a single step, e.g., ./review.sh redo.
./review.sh redo
Anyone else have thoughts on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Review Draft publication goes relatively well (though see #348) as per https://github.com/whatwg/meta/blob/main/MAINTAINERS.md#review-drafts. One problem is recovering from build failures.
When hitting a build failure my current process is something like this:
review.sh
script by commenting out four lines (starting withgit checkout main
) to avoid it creating a new branch.review.sh
executable viachmod 755 review.sh
(755 is prolly too much?).Step 1 is always needed. Ideally step 2 through 7 would be replaced by a single step, e.g.,
./review.sh redo
.Anyone else have thoughts on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: