fititnt commented 5 minutes ago An advantage of English over other languages is that it is much easier to find tools to evaluate this type of improvement.
I suggest the following:
- Atom Editor plugin: https://github.com/gepoch/linter-write-good
- Shell: http://matt.might.net/articles/shell-scripts-for-passive-voice-weasel-words-duplicates/
- Perl: https://github.com/devd/Academic-Writing-Check
- NodeJS: https://www.npmjs.com/package/write-good#passive
$ write-good semantics-embedded-content.include In semantics-embedded-content.include ============= e in HTML, when there is only a single image resource, ^^^^ "only" can weaken meaning on line 9 at column 43 ------------- However, there are a number of situations for which the author might wish to u ^^^^^^^ "However" is wordy or unneeded on line 21 at column 2 (...)Check https://gist.github.com/fititnt/b34f531ed42470412e6fa371e7e7830a for rest of output
From comment w3c/html#634 (comment)
To see diff of, for example, new changes to HTML 5.2 (https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/textlevel-semantics.html#textlevel-semantics) from Text-level semantics from HTML 5.1
- Go to http://services.w3.org/htmldiff
- Address of reference document: https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/textlevel-semantics.html#textlevel-semantics
- Address of new document: https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/textlevel-semantics.html
- Press "get Diff"
- New page with diffs will be http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Fhtml51%2Ftextlevel-semantics.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Fhtml52%2Ftextlevel-semantics.html
Right now does not work, error 500. It's probably a very costly request. URL to test: http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Fhtml51%2Fsingle-page.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Fhtml52%2Fsingle-page.html