Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Documentation Feedback]: Define the PersistentVolumeClass needed/recommended for Weaviate #183

Open
ju-bezdek opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
discussion/suggestion needs review Needs someone to review (eg whether it is still relevant)

Comments

@ju-bezdek
Copy link

Page URL

https://github.com/semi-technologies/weaviate-io/blob/main/developers/weaviate/current/configuration/backups-and-persistence.md#kubernetes

User feedback

We needed to dig quite a lot into problems that I've encountered just to find out that my k8s setup was using PersistentVolumeClass that was a combination of hard-drive with SSD cache that made the result performance vary.. (and might result in weaviate timeous )

You might want to note this here... since the only way how to discover this (if you won't use the standard HELM chart) is by analysing the helm chart it self.

Just add a note here:

https://github.com/semi-technologies/weaviate-io/blob/main/developers/weaviate/current/configuration/backups-and-persistence.md#kubernetes

that you need
spec:
storageClassName: premium-rwo

(at least for GCP... you might want to check it for AWS/Azure too)

@databyjp databyjp added discussion/suggestion needs review Needs someone to review (eg whether it is still relevant) labels Apr 26, 2023
@network-charles
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is no longer valid, and I suggest it be closed.
The current helm file for the v1.26.3 image has a default definition that includes the PV storage class name.

storage:
  size: 32Gi
  storageClassName: ""
  fullnameOverride: ""

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion/suggestion needs review Needs someone to review (eg whether it is still relevant)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants