-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add "Security and Privacy Considerations" to all use cases (or requirements) #168
Comments
The following may be relevant (note that it was updated in 2019): https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/ |
We should update the HTML version now with "blank" security and privacy considerations sections... (McCool to make a PR) |
Should just create issues for particular use cases over in the use case repo. Then we can track which use cases have considered privacy and security and which ones have not. For example: |
We should start this by having a set of questions to be asked for each use case, such as "does this handle PII"? "Is access control needed?" "Are there safety considerations for access?" |
Note that when we did the CR last time we had to answer a long set of questions about security, and we can look back to the answers to those. Most of them were not actually relevant to IoT, but some were. |
Brainstorm from security TF call May 10. We also looked at the Self-Review Questionnaire and tried to extract anything useful (there was surprisingly not much, since it is very browser-focused and spends a lot of time on same-origin constraints, etc). Security:
Privacy:
|
Probably should add:
|
In https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/tree/master/USE-CASES a number of use cases have been assembled. For each one we should consider the security and privacy requirements and document them. This could also go into "requirements", but then "Security and Privacy Considerations" should be added to the requirements template at https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/blob/master/REQUIREMENTS/requirements-template.md
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: