Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why should a subscriber subscribe to more than one hub #133

Open
aaronpk opened this issue Oct 25, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

why should a subscriber subscribe to more than one hub #133

aaronpk opened this issue Oct 25, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@aaronpk
Copy link
Member

aaronpk commented Oct 25, 2017

5: “If more than one URL is specified, it is expected that the publisher pings each of these URLs, so the subscriber may subscribe to one or more of these.”

Why should a subscriber subscribe to "more of these"? It would be more interesting to know how to pick a hub out of this list (always first might not be optimal).


From #127 by @mkovatsc

@aaronpk
Copy link
Member Author

aaronpk commented Nov 16, 2017

@julien51 do you have any recommendations here?

@julien51
Copy link
Collaborator

Fault tolerance and redundancy is the main reason for this. If for some reason the hub in the middle fails to propagate the update, then using multiple independent hubs is a way to increase the delivery likeliness.

@aaronpk
Copy link
Member Author

aaronpk commented Nov 21, 2017

Thanks julien! I've added a note along these lines to the draft!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants