diff --git a/guidelines/index.html b/guidelines/index.html index 162615ce..ad730457 100644 --- a/guidelines/index.html +++ b/guidelines/index.html @@ -516,10 +516,48 @@
For this first draft, the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has focused on the basic conformance model. For a next draft, we will explore how conforming alternative versions fit into the new conformance model.
+For this first draft, the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has focused on the basic conformance model. For a next draft, we will explore how accessibility-supported fits into the new conformance model.
+The subgroup has been discussing how we should handle the “accessibility-supported” concept in WCAG 3. The subgroup identified the following two directions and there are five options for the first direction at this time.
+For the next step, the subgroup must first decide if WCAG 3 must keep the “accessibility-supported” concept (#1) or not (#2). If WCAG 3 will keep AS (#1), there are five options (from a. to e. above) to improve and clarify the “accessibility-supported” concept in WCAG 3.
+Here are questions the subgroup will need to address based on our findings so far:
+The subgroup has identified the following outstanding issues:
+When evaluating the accessibility of content, WCAG 3.0 requires the outcomes apply to a specific scope. While the scope can be an all content within a digital product, it is usually one or more sub-sets of the whole. Reasons for this include: