-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Does the API support timeout? #67
Comments
Given SPC is in some ways a special form of WebAuthn, I would be inclined to follow their lead: a |
Timeouts make sense to me regardless of what has gone before - in many payment scenarios there will be a fixed amount of time to complete a given operation such as confirmation for obvious reasons. Moreover in most Webauthn scenarios the timeout will kick in so I'm wondering if it will be difficult to unpick that behaviour given we are overlaying Webauthn with Payment Request. |
Do you have a particular scenario in mind? Some questions:
I don't know whether SPC needs to be the locus of the timeout, but maybe it could be. And it sounds like being able to set a parameter to confirm with regulation would be useful. I wonder whether signing the parameter value would also be useful. Thus, there could be cryptographic evidence that an SPC assertion was generated within a specified time frame.
[1] https://www.eba.europa.eu/single-rule-book-qa/-/qna/view/publicId/2018_4065 |
|
Short answer: I don't know. It might well suffice when SPC is used within PR API. But see also potential uses of SPC outside of PR API: |
Closing this because the API supports timeout: |
Raised in discussion with @Goosth:
What happens? Are there timeout parameters?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: