Bring this document to CR

[jyasskin]

@torgo was wondering about the consensus state of this document, since it's "just" a WD. I think it has consensus, and it's widely used, so the WG should probably formally advance it to CR.

[mikewest]

@dveditz, and @simoneonofri as staff contact.

I'd defer to @miketaylr and @marcoscaceres. My recollection is that they had some refactoring work planned, but I don't remember whether there was anything substantive. If not, then I agree that publishing as CR and moving to a living model would be excellent next steps.

[simoneonofri]

If the group agrees (we need to register that decision) we have some to do for transition.

[miketaylr]

Marcos and I will discuss in our next meeting, thanks.

[marcoscaceres]

I created #457 as a start..

@simoneonofri, can you help us with kicking off horizontal reviews?

[marcoscaceres]

We probably need to do the questionnaires... we should plan time to do those.

[simoneonofri]

@marcoscaceres thank you for the issue, for the questionnaire, let me know how I can help!