You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There may or may not be any internationalization concerns with the spec, but we should make sure to have an "Internationalization Considerations" section stating that we've taken i18n into consideration. Of course, if there are things that should be considered, we should add them there :)
We will also ask the i18n WG to review the spec to see if they have any feedback for us.
For a spec standpoint, there doesn't appear to me to be any i18n issues. All of the information that's provided as part of the API isn't user-generated, and I'm not sure if there's any other i18n obligations outside of that. From looking at the appmanifest spec as an example, it seems their i18n section focuses on user-generated content at the least,
If there's consensus on this, would the best practice be to omit the section or simply state that there aren't any "Internationalization Considerations" as part of that section?
There may or may not be any internationalization concerns with the spec, but we should make sure to have an "Internationalization Considerations" section stating that we've taken i18n into consideration. Of course, if there are things that should be considered, we should add them there :)
We will also ask the i18n WG to review the spec to see if they have any feedback for us.
This is part of w3c/webappswg#25
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: