-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(deps): update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [security] #407
Open
renovate
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
renovate
bot
added
dependencies
Pull requests that update a dependency file
ready for review
labels
Dec 22, 2022
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
from
December 31, 2022 19:30
84b18c5
to
47cc42d
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
3 times, most recently
from
January 13, 2023 21:57
1868737
to
7c52b2c
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 21, 2023 19:39
76db81a
to
993fa94
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
4 times, most recently
from
February 8, 2023 21:05
2167af2
to
4f3dc09
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
3 times, most recently
from
February 16, 2023 12:01
2c4265e
to
0d387d5
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
2 times, most recently
from
March 3, 2023 13:53
8fa0b34
to
7c73558
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
from
March 7, 2023 15:03
7c73558
to
3afaf3d
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
2 times, most recently
from
March 17, 2023 18:41
acff343
to
f991669
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
4 times, most recently
from
March 31, 2023 23:49
9d4cae0
to
53be67f
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
3 times, most recently
from
April 18, 2023 18:05
516219d
to
45b3789
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
2 times, most recently
from
April 26, 2023 01:51
3bb12f7
to
51209f1
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
5 times, most recently
from
October 7, 2024 14:27
326f82c
to
2cd0b6d
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
7 times, most recently
from
October 16, 2024 00:31
68c536a
to
a0f8eb2
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
6 times, most recently
from
October 23, 2024 14:44
1591499
to
66654e3
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
4 times, most recently
from
October 31, 2024 13:44
a2a62ac
to
ad72425
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
4 times, most recently
from
November 15, 2024 20:33
292c49a
to
04b287b
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
from
November 27, 2024 12:02
04b287b
to
807660f
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability/VF-000
branch
from
November 27, 2024 12:05
807660f
to
954a03e
Compare
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
8.5.1
->9.0.0
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2022-23539
Overview
Versions
<=8.5.1
ofjsonwebtoken
library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm.Am I affected?
You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than the combinations mentioned below
And for Elliptic Curve algorithms:
alg
How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, If you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the
allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes
option totrue
in thesign()
and/orverify()
functions.Will the fix impact my users?
There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you already use a valid secure combination of key type and algorithm. Otherwise, use the
allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes
option totrue
in thesign()
andverify()
functions to continue usage of invalid key type/algorithm combination in 9.0.0 for legacy compatibility.CVE-2022-23541
Overview
Versions
<=8.5.1
ofjsonwebtoken
library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function (referring to thesecretOrPublicKey
argument from the readme link) will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens.Am I affected?
You will be affected if your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function.
How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0.
Will the fix impact my users?
There is no impact for end users
CVE-2022-23540
Overview
In versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library, lack of algorithm definition and a falsy secret or key in the
jwt.verify()
function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to thenone
algorithm for signature verification.Am I affected?
You will be affected if all the following are true in the
jwt.verify()
function:How do I fix it?
Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the
jwt.verify()
method.Will the fix impact my users?
There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the
none
algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that injwt.verify()
options.Release Notes
auth0/node-jsonwebtoken (jsonwebtoken)
v9.0.0
Compare Source
Breaking changes: See Migration from v8 to v9
Breaking changes
8345030
]auth0/node-jsonwebtoken@8345030)ecdf6cc
]auth0/node-jsonwebtoken@ecdf6cc)Security fixes
Arbitrary File Write via verify function
- CVE-2022-23529Insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() could lead to signature validation bypass
- CVE-2022-23540Insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC
- CVE-2022-23541Unrestricted key type could lead to legacy keys usage
- CVE-2022-23539Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.