You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The PascalCoin price mystery in the web/desktop wallet is solved, I know what it does:
Apperently the software does the following:
It looks at my wallet and then how many pascalcoins are on the exchange.
Then it finds the highest price for a pascalcoin in any pair and converts the price to BTC.
Then it multiplies the number of coins in the wallet on the exchange by this highest price.
Here is the problem:
Currently there is only one pair for PascalCoin: PASC/BTC on ViteX.
However on coinmarketcap.com it can be seen that there were other pairs for PascalCoin such as:
2.1 PASC/ETH (0.00000006759 BTC)
2.2 PASC/USDT (0.000001368 BTC)
2.3 PASC/VITE (0.0000004271 BTC)
So the web wallet/desktop wallet sees that 2.2 is the highest price for a pascalcoin.
So the web wallet multiplies number of PascalCoins X PASC/USDT price in BTC
However as far as I know it's not possible to trade these pairs currently on ViteX, so this price is misleading ?!?
So if the developers or lead of the project agrees then I hope that these calculations are done differently and that the wallet assests are computed only based on "highest allowed trade pair".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The PascalCoin price mystery in the web/desktop wallet is solved, I know what it does:
Apperently the software does the following:
Here is the problem:
Currently there is only one pair for PascalCoin: PASC/BTC on ViteX.
However on coinmarketcap.com it can be seen that there were other pairs for PascalCoin such as:
2.1 PASC/ETH (0.00000006759 BTC)
2.2 PASC/USDT (0.000001368 BTC)
2.3 PASC/VITE (0.0000004271 BTC)
So the web wallet/desktop wallet sees that 2.2 is the highest price for a pascalcoin.
However as far as I know it's not possible to trade these pairs currently on ViteX, so this price is misleading ?!?
So if the developers or lead of the project agrees then I hope that these calculations are done differently and that the wallet assests are computed only based on "highest allowed trade pair".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: