Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

clientOnly() instead of <ClientOnly> #102

Closed
brillout opened this issue Apr 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

clientOnly() instead of <ClientOnly> #102

brillout opened this issue Apr 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
contribution-welcome 💕 easy-contribution 🌱 enhancement ✨ New feature or request high-prio 💫

Comments

@brillout
Copy link
Member

brillout commented Apr 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

See vike-solid's clientOnly().

A clientOnly() helper is a much nicer DX than a <ClientOnly> wrapper.

Contribution welcome.

See also:
@brillout brillout changed the title clientOnly() function instead of <ClientOnly> wrapper component clientOnly() instead of <ClientOnly> Jun 17, 2024
@nitedani
Copy link
Member

nitedani commented Jul 7, 2024

Completed in #127

@nitedani nitedani closed this as completed Jul 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
contribution-welcome 💕 easy-contribution 🌱 enhancement ✨ New feature or request high-prio 💫
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@brillout @nitedani