diff --git a/musings/tee-arch-options.md b/musings/tee-arch-options.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e6267ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/musings/tee-arch-options.md
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+# Deploy with TEEs
+
+## AWS Nitro prototype
+
+* An "all-in-one-node" architecture, i.e., the scaling unit is the services conglomerate
+* The intended split is:
+  * TCB in _confidential_ VM (Nitro)
+  * Non-TCB _normal_ VM (EC2)
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart LR
+    SCA((supply</br>chain))
+    ARP((attester</br>/ RP))
+    subgraph EC2 Instance
+    VFE
+    PFE
+    end
+    ARP-- REST API ---VFE
+    SCA-- REST API ---PFE
+    VFE-- grpc/vsock ---VTS
+    PFE-- grpc/vsock ---VTS
+    subgraph Nitro Enclave
+    VTS
+    end
+    VTS== ioctl ===NSM
+    VTS-- kvstore ---DB[(Dynamo</br>/ RDS<br/>/ memory)]
+```
+
+### Observations
+
+* Problem: the TCB _currently_ leaks into PFE: we need to move the whole CoRIM processor (both crypto verification and endorsements extraction) into VTS
+  * Also, the tenant's bearer token presented to PFE MUST be bound to the CoRIM signer's key
+* When generating the EAR signing key-pair on the fly (rather than pre-provisioning), the caching strategy that uses `.well-known/veraison` requires some form of session stickiness (e.g., API router needs dispatch based on the requester -- e.g., IP, bearer token, cookie).
+
+## Alternative "all-in-one-node" architecture
+
+* TCB and non-TCP in _confidential_ VM (Nitro)
+* Transparent proxying function at the transport level in the _normal_ VM (EC2)
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart LR
+    SCA((supply</br>chain))
+    ARP((attester</br>/ RP))
+    subgraph EC2 Instance
+    tcp2vsock-pfe
+    tcp2vsock-vfe
+    end
+    ARP-- REST API ---tcp2vsock-vfe
+    SCA-- REST API ---tcp2vsock-pfe
+    VFE-- grpc/localhost ---VTS
+    PFE-- grpc/localhost ---VTS
+    subgraph Nitro Enclave
+    VFE
+    PFE
+    VTS
+    end
+    VTS== ioctl ===NSM
+    VTS-- kvstore ---DB[(Dynamo</br>/ RDS<br/>/ memory)]
+    tcp2vsock-vfe-- REST API/vsock ---VFE
+    tcp2vsock-pfe-- REST API/vsock ---PFE
+```
+
+* All services are in the TCB, which is not great (obvious increase of attack surface)
+* Only mods required:
+  * REST FEs initialisation to use vsock
+  * TCP to vsock proxy component[^1]
+  
+[^1]: There may be existing SW for this but I haven't investigated.  In any case it'd be a trivial piece of code.
+
+## Disaggregated architectures
+
+* All services are allocated to separate VMs
+* API frontends (PFE and VFE) are hosted in normal EC2 instances
+* VTS is hosted in a Nitro enclave with its parent EC2 instance running a vsock proxy
+* An L3/L4 gRPC load balancer distributes the load among the available VTS
+* Ideal when the load between provisioning and verification pipelines is asymmetric.  This is the expected case.
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart LR
+    SCA((supply</br>chain))
+    ARP-1((attester</br>/ RP))
+    ARP-2((attester</br>/ RP))
+    subgraph p1 [EC2 Instance]
+    PFE-1[PFE]
+    end
+    subgraph v1 [EC2 Instance]
+    VFE-1[VFE]
+    end
+    subgraph v2 [EC2 Instance]
+    VFE-2[VFE]
+    end
+    subgraph grpclb [gRPC LB]
+    gRPC-LB
+    end
+    SCA-- REST ---PFE-1
+    ARP-1-- REST ---VFE-1
+    ARP-2-- REST ---VFE-2
+    PFE-1-- gRPC ---gRPC-LB
+    VFE-1-- gRPC ---gRPC-LB
+    VFE-2-- gRPC ---gRPC-LB
+    subgraph vtsfe1 [EC2 Instance]
+    tcp2vsock-vts-1[vsock-proxy]
+    end
+    subgraph vtsfe2 [EC2 Instance]
+    tcp2vsock-vts-2[vsock-proxy]
+    end
+    subgraph vtsbe1 [Nitro Enclave]
+    VTS-1[VTS]
+    end
+    subgraph vtsbe2 [Nitro Enclave]
+    VTS-2[VTS]
+    end
+    subgraph vts2 [ ]
+    vtsfe2
+    vtsbe2
+    end
+    subgraph vts1 [ ]
+    vtsfe1
+    vtsbe1
+    end
+    gRPC-LB-- gRPC ---tcp2vsock-vts-1
+    gRPC-LB-- gRPC ---tcp2vsock-vts-2
+    tcp2vsock-vts-1-- gRPC/vsock ---VTS-1
+    tcp2vsock-vts-2-- gRPC/vsock ---VTS-2
+    VTS-1-- kvstore ---DB[(Dynamo</br>/ RDS<br/>/ memory)]
+    VTS-1== ioctl ===NSM-1[NSM]
+    VTS-2-- kvstore ---DB[(Dynamo</br>/ RDS<br/>/ memory)]
+    VTS-2== ioctl ===NSM-2[NSM]
+```