Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: improve javadoc example #2917

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

chore: improve javadoc example #2917

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

taefi
Copy link
Contributor

@taefi taefi commented Nov 21, 2024

This improves the logic in the javadoc example.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 21, 2024

@taefi taefi enabled auto-merge (squash) November 21, 2024 10:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.64%. Comparing base (0e4ba3e) to head (80307f4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2917   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.64%   92.64%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines        2842     2842           
  Branches      739      739           
=======================================
  Hits         2633     2633           
  Misses        158      158           
  Partials       51       51           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 92.64% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@taefi taefi merged commit 952de7a into main Nov 21, 2024
15 checks passed
@taefi taefi deleted the taefi/fix-javadoc branch November 21, 2024 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants