refactor: Do not use installAutoSignalTracking

[Artur-]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.81%. Comparing base (210fae2) to head (78176cf).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2576      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.71%   90.81%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          66       66              
  Lines        2649     2765     +116     
  Branches      528      528              
==========================================
+ Hits         2403     2511     +108     
- Misses         77       79       +2     
- Partials      169      175       +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	90.81% <ø> (+0.10%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Artur-]

Depends on vaadin/flow#19639

[Artur-]

With the Flow PR, at least react-i18n and react-signals pass locally

[Artur-]

Maybe there is a better way with Karma to add

window.$RefreshReg$ = () => {}
window.$RefreshSig$ = () => (type) => type
window.__vite_plugin_react_preamble_installed__ = true

The "correct" way would be to pass the HTML files through Vite but I don't see how that would be possible

[platosha]

Using custom Karma HTML is OK to me. @Lodin WDYT?

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
2 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[Lodin]

Looks a bit hacky to me but let's have it this way. I hope we will be able to solve it easier in #2480