You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When validating an SSP with the oscal-cli, a warning is raised saying that a start port exists but an end doesn't and vice versa, when both start and end are present in the OSCAL being validated.
Warning:
OSCAL SSP section being flagged:
Who is the bug affecting
Any user looking to validate their OSCAL SSP with port-ranges provided.
What is affected by this bug
OSCAL Content
How do we replicate this issue
Create an OSCAL SSP with a component>protocol>port-ranges element (with start and end provided).
Validate the OSCAL SSP with the oscal-cli
Expected behavior (i.e. solution)
No warning should be raised (clutters the error log) when there is no actual issue with the port-ranges structure.
Other comments
No response
Revisions
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is fixed by the commit 751e2d7 in develop branch and will be released with all other fixies in develop as soon as we address the camelCase data type issue which was removed but it is being requested back by GSA.
Describe the bug
When validating an SSP with the oscal-cli, a warning is raised saying that a start port exists but an end doesn't and vice versa, when both start and end are present in the OSCAL being validated.
Warning:
OSCAL SSP section being flagged:
Who is the bug affecting
Any user looking to validate their OSCAL SSP with port-ranges provided.
What is affected by this bug
OSCAL Content
How do we replicate this issue
Expected behavior (i.e. solution)
No warning should be raised (clutters the error log) when there is no actual issue with the port-ranges structure.
Other comments
No response
Revisions
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: