From ea63b91239ce19132789c13c65514c898113abef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michaela Iorga <michaela@nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 14:35:39 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Addressed port range implementation error issue #2023 and
 discussion board

---
 .gitignore                                                | 1 +
 src/metaschema/oscal_implementation-common_metaschema.xml | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index bc48dcc7c9..75fd1bc863 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ vault
 /OSCAL-dev.xpr
 .vscode
 .DS_Store
+.history
 
 # Working files
 scratch
diff --git a/src/metaschema/oscal_implementation-common_metaschema.xml b/src/metaschema/oscal_implementation-common_metaschema.xml
index c9eaebbfd9..b4e5b0fa34 100644
--- a/src/metaschema/oscal_implementation-common_metaschema.xml
+++ b/src/metaschema/oscal_implementation-common_metaschema.xml
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@
                   <expect level="WARNING" target="." test="exists(@end)" id="port-range-has-end">
                         <message>A port range should have an end port given. To define a single port, the start and end should be the same value.</message>
                   </expect>
-                  <expect level="WARNING" target="." test="not(@start > @end)" id="port-range-starts-before-end">
+                  <expect level="WARNING" target="." test="not(@start > @end)" id="port-range-starts-before-ends">
                         <message>The port range start should not be after its end.</message>
                   </expect>
             </constraint>