You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The order of locations for record groups is misleading and is likely to direct researchers to the wrong location. For example, a search for RG 233 returns several locations and the Center is towards the bottom of the list. It is not clear that the Center is the primary custodial unit for RG 233 and has the vast majority of holdings. Can we sort RG locations by volume of holdings?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jmfcoleman
changed the title
GFR: Record Group Locations
GFR: Sort RG locations by volume of holdings
Jan 31, 2017
The order of locations for record groups is misleading and is likely to direct researchers to the wrong location. For example, a search for RG 233 returns several locations and the Center is towards the bottom of the list. It is not clear that the Center is the primary custodial unit for RG 233 and has the vast majority of holdings. Can we sort RG locations by volume of holdings?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: