-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 509
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: expired keys batch management toolkit [SIDE QUEST] #2539
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
chore: expired keys batch management toolkit [SIDE QUEST] #2539
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new entry in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@unrenamed is attempting to deploy a commit to the Unkey Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
oss.gg/7_create_a_template.md (1)
58-58
: Remove the extra newline for consistency.The extra blank line after the entry differs from the format of other entries in the list.
» 22-October-2024 by Nazar Poshtarenko [Batch Management of Expired Unkey API Keys](https://github.com/unrenamed/unkey-expired-keys-cleanup) -
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- oss.gg/7_create_a_template.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
oss.gg/7_create_a_template.md (1)
57-57
: LGTM! The template submission meets all requirements.The new entry follows the correct format and introduces a unique template that demonstrates practical SDK capabilities for managing expired keys.
Hmm, I'm not sure how I feel about this. It's true that most templates are pretty basic, but this would be much better suited as documentation, rather than templates I think |
like a tutorial or dev blog post on how to clean up your Unkey API from all expired keys? I like this. Any ideas where would it suit best — Blogs or Docs (and which part)? |
tbh either one could work, but we'll probably be too late for hacktoberfest, I've sent you a discord dm |
What does this PR do?
Adds a template that showcases how to seed your Unkey API with expired keys and perform a fast, efficient cleanup of those keys with a single command.
https://github.com/unrenamed/unkey-expired-keys-cleanup
Fixes #2150
Summary by CodeRabbit