You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi there - when ordinals first launched, I created a browser-extension wallet experience utilizing the client's Nostr Key (https://github.com/deezy-inc/deezy-place). Unfortunately we are no longer actively supporting this product, but many people still have ordinals on these wallets. We want them to be able to import their key into Unisat.
I was wondering - would Unisat team be open to us proposing an additional keyring type, something like nonstandard-taproot-keyring.ts (https://github.com/unisat-wallet/wallet-sdk/tree/master/src/keyring). We can write all the code and propose it both here and then in the unisat browser extension repo. If so, then all our users could safely migrate to unisat easily. We would suggest that this keyring type be hidden from new users, as it is not recommended - only for use of recovering existing assets.
Please let me know what you think - just wanted to check before our team started work on the proposed changes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
i just ran into this exact problem. bip341 tweaks are a mess, as there is no way to extract the nostr pubkey from tweaked addresses.
However, i believe it is possible to go from raw private keys to Tweaked private/public keys - so depending on what you are trying to do it may be possible.
Hi there - when ordinals first launched, I created a browser-extension wallet experience utilizing the client's Nostr Key (https://github.com/deezy-inc/deezy-place). Unfortunately we are no longer actively supporting this product, but many people still have ordinals on these wallets. We want them to be able to import their key into Unisat.
The problem is that in my lack of experience and haste of building, our wallets generated non-standard taproot addresses, and therefore the typical private key import/export does not work nicely. In particular, we use a raw public key instead of properly tweaking it, see the mess: https://github.com/deezy-inc/nosft-core/blob/e586d27256c41d91d46f229c6afee976dcae15e2/src/app/psbt.ts#L323
I was wondering - would Unisat team be open to us proposing an additional keyring type, something like
nonstandard-taproot-keyring.ts
(https://github.com/unisat-wallet/wallet-sdk/tree/master/src/keyring). We can write all the code and propose it both here and then in the unisat browser extension repo. If so, then all our users could safely migrate to unisat easily. We would suggest that this keyring type be hidden from new users, as it is not recommended - only for use of recovering existing assets.Please let me know what you think - just wanted to check before our team started work on the proposed changes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: