[UNDERTOW-2523] Prepare for Jakarta Servlet 6.1 #1702
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jamezp
force-pushed
the
jakarta-servlet-6.1
branch
4 times, most recently
from
d618c68
to
d0773d8
Compare
jamezp
force-pushed
the
jakarta-servlet-6.1
branch
from
d0773d8
to
76737e9
Compare
jamezp
changed the title
…ta Servlet 6.1 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-2523 Signed-off-by: James R. Perkins <[email protected]>
…ervlet 6.1. Note this changed the Cookie specification to RFC 6265 which required test changes. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-2523 Signed-off-by: James R. Perkins <[email protected]>
jamezp
force-pushed
the
jakarta-servlet-6.1
branch
from
76737e9
to
b6fae03
Compare
fl4via
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the initial updates to support Jakarta Servlet 6.1. This not complete and the changes since 6.0 need to be reviewed.
This passes the current 6.1 TCK, but will fail the upstream TCK if built from source. I'll discuss the details on chat.
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-2523