Replies: 3 comments 19 replies
-
pls use discussions for this type of requests/ideas |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
first of all, I have no clue what "frontend side are looks really bad" even means. This is the frontend and it works as designed. You are welcome to submit PRs fixing whatever "looks really bad" to you. I am also not sure what type of SDK you have in mind and what's wrong with API. If you want an alternative frontend - API is here and you can implement anything you like. @akellbl4 - maybe you have a clue? Well, considering the "really bad" frontend side made mostly by you, I doubt you are capable of providing anything useful, but give it a try ;) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The frontend side is not customizable, use a global variables instead of give me instance object at least, contains a minified code, not fixed bugs like #1340 It's fine, but i prefer to implement my own UI, with my favorite UI library on my favorite framework. API it's good, i want to you provide a wrapper over your API, to shift maintenance responsibility from me to the remark42 contributors |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, your comments system looks great, i like how fast it may be configure and deploy.
However, the frontend side are looks really bad. I suggest to introduce a SDK which allow to clients make own implementations of comments component.
I know about https://remark42.com/docs/contributing/api/ page and it's really good, but i'm not ready to support wrappers over API of comments engine. Your product is really good, you give us a way to fast deploy self hosted comments, as user i expect a tools to as fast implement my own component which can use all powerful of remark42 as i can deploy the backend.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions