-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consistent field names between CMEPS, MOM6 and CICE6 #1905
Closed
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
@jkbk2004 - |
@natalie-perlin may I ask why this is assigned to code management team? |
@natalie-perlin Please, don't assign randomly. |
This was referenced Sep 15, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description
Currently there is a mix of field names being used in MOM6 and CICE6, meaning some field names are specified CESM-style (F = flux, S = state) and some using descriptions (mean_xxx_flux). This was the result of unifying both the MOM6 and CICE6 caps at the same time that UFS was transitioning from the NEMS mediator to the CMEPS mediator. The CMEPS mediator in UFS uses only CESM-style field names.
It is clearer from a user perspective and for developing documentation if the naming convention is consistent. It also avoids the ambiguity around what "mean" means (spatial, temporal, both?). The "averaging" context can be provided in the description entry in the field dictionary if required.
Solution
Coupling field names in the MOM6 and CIE6 caps need to be changed to the CESM-style (S=state, F=flux) field names.
Note that for WW3, the only non CESM style field name will be resolved in NOAA-EMC/WW3/pull/1034
Alternatives
Related to
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: