Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/binaries publishing #2

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: feature/macosdistribution
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wotd
Copy link

@wotd wotd commented Aug 1, 2018

No description provided.

Copy link

@wiorka wiorka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this PR going to be pushed upstream at some point? If not, why do we have so many configurations that are going to be built?

.travis.yml Outdated
env: PATH="/usr/bin:$PATH" TEST=analyze
# - os: linux
# compiler: gcc
# env: CUDA=8.0.61-1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

commented out stuff can be removed

.travis.yml Outdated
dist: trusty
env: FEATURES="--enable-memcached"
- os: linux
compiler: clang
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what does that mean? Does it compile with clang, or for clang? Does ccache have to be compiled for certain compiler?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Documentation of travis says that are tests suits agains clang/gcc: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/c/

I removed other linux entries - Left only those added by Martin.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's still not entirely clear to me, but I can figure it out later not to block this PR.

@martinm82
Copy link
Member

martinm82 commented Aug 2, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants