Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Odd parsing of runs associated with a single biosample #341

Open
mestato opened this issue Feb 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Odd parsing of runs associated with a single biosample #341

mestato opened this issue Feb 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
bug waiting_on_submitter More information is needed from the submitter before proceeding

Comments

@mestato
Copy link
Member

mestato commented Feb 24, 2020

Odd behavior found when adding bioproject (PRJEB4873) which has 1 biosample (SAMEA2229347) and 6 experiments each with 1 run (e.g. ERR359850).

After loading biosample XML, Casey found that 7 records were created. One for each run, however, the records do not have db cross references to bioproject or biosample or SRA. And one for the biosample that was not clickable in page view for organism. (see below)

image
https://hardwoodgenomics.org/organism/Quercus/robur?tripal_pane=gp_Biomaterials

Some of the problems such as cross-references has been manually fixed and we don't have the original XML uploaded by Casey, so first task would be to recreate this and see if the behavior is reproducible.

@mestato mestato added the bug label Feb 24, 2020
@CaseyRichards92
Copy link

I can try and re load the xml from NCBI and see if this issue replicates itself? Should I delete the current biosamples or will they overwrite ?

@mestato
Copy link
Member Author

mestato commented Feb 26, 2020

If @noahcaldwell7 has a dev version of Tripal with the gene expression module installed, that would be a good testing ground. Since we've already done some manual additions to the biosamples and haven't come up with a good policy on this type of situation, I don't want to overwrite anything or alter the live site yet

@spficklin
Copy link
Member

spficklin commented Feb 27, 2022

Not sure if this is still a problem but I tested loading the biosample mentioned here using the updated loader in PR #392 and it only created one BioSample record. So perhaps it's fixed?

@spficklin spficklin added the waiting_on_submitter More information is needed from the submitter before proceeding label Feb 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug waiting_on_submitter More information is needed from the submitter before proceeding
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants