We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, I've noticed that running the same animation through "-p" and -f yields different behaviors.
-f
I made a smooth animation using a sile and the -f flag.
setup 1,8,3 init fill 1,ff3300,0,8 fade 1,0,80,16 render delay 100 do fade 1,79,10,16 fade 1,11,80,26 delay 100 render loop 3 fade 1,80,0,16
Now, converting it to a script using the -p is not smooth anymore,
-p
Can you confirm?
led_channel=1 led_count=8 led_type=3 led_invert=0 led_gpio=18 led_brightness=20 rgb_yellow=ffb100 read -r -d '' animation <<- EOM setup ${led_channel},${led_count},${led_type},${led_invert},${led_brightness},${led_gpio} init fill 1,${rgb_yellow},0,8 fade 1,0,80,16 render delay 100 fade 1,79,10,16 fade 1,11,80,26 delay 100 render fade 1,79,10,16 fade 1,11,80,26 delay 100 render fade 1,79,10,16 fade 1,11,80,26 delay 100 render fade 1,80,0,16 EOM echo "$animation" > /dev/ws281x
It looks like the fade command is different between these two versions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just removed the last part of my command and it looks like it working better
Replacing this
setup ${led_channel},${led_count},${led_type},${led_invert},${led_brightness},${led_gpio}
with this
setup ${led_channel},${led_count},${led_type}
Sorry, something went wrong.
I was not at home this weekend will take a look at it later
Sure, when you have time.
No branches or pull requests
Hi, I've noticed that running the same animation through "-p" and
-f
yields different behaviors.I made a smooth animation using a sile and the
-f
flag.Now, converting it to a script using the
-p
is not smooth anymore,Can you confirm?
It looks like the fade command is different between these two versions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: