Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

relative performance of FastRational is faster in your test #36

Open
JeffreySarnoff opened this issue Jun 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@JeffreySarnoff
Copy link

with Julia v1.10.0-DEV1429

using Ratios, FastRationals, BenchmarkTools

julia> @btime x + y setup=((x, y) = (SimpleRatio(rand(-20:20), rand(2:20)), SimpleRatio(rand(-20:20), rand(2:20))));
  22.668 ns (1 allocation: 32 bytes)

julia> @btime x * y setup=((x, y) = (SimpleRatio(rand(-20:20), rand(2:20)), SimpleRatio(rand(-20:20), rand(2:20))));
  22.367 ns (1 allocation: 32 bytes)


julia> @btime x + y setup=((x, y) = (FastRational(rand(-20:20), rand(2:20)), FastRational(rand(-20:20), rand(2:20))));
  5.900 ns (0 allocations: 0 bytes)

julia> @btime x * y setup=((x, y) = (FastRational(rand(-20:20), rand(2:20)), FastRational(rand(-20:20), rand(2:20))));
  5.900 ns (0 allocations: 0 bytes)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant