Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: outputNbt clarification #62

Open
Matiam0 opened this issue Feb 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature Request]: outputNbt clarification #62

Matiam0 opened this issue Feb 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Matiam0
Copy link

Matiam0 commented Feb 13, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem?

I would like a more applicable example of what to put for the outputNbt tag when adding transmutation recipes. I've tried "Variant:4", {"Variant":4}, [{Variant:4}], [{"Variant":4}], Variant:4, "Variant":4, etc. for horses and none of them work. I've even tried moving where the outputNbt tag is in the recipe.

Solution(s)

???

Describe alternatives you've considered

I would like it to be clearified if nbt tags can even be added for transmutations/manifestations and if so a working example.

Mod Version

2.2.3

Mod Loader Version

1.19.2 - 0.14.14

Mod Loader

Fabric

Additional context

No response

@Matiam0 Matiam0 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 13, 2023
@Matiam0
Copy link
Author

Matiam0 commented Feb 13, 2023

Going to add this as a bug report, copied everything that the atmtts modpack and I can confirm that outputNbt does not function at all with fabric.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant