You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
so that v0.1.0 is good enough for other extensions to use.
It's best if other extensions can configure their validators via simple ruby code to provide 1 or more (schema, data) pairs to validate, the static schema can be loaded via yaml files (the abstract, complex helper APIs are provided by this extension to leverage https://github.com/ruby-json-schema/json-schema).
For full control of validators, extensions can implement the validate or validate_common, validate_node methods of the validators
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hoatle
changed the title
should add comments/proposals/changes to implement for v0.1.0
should add spec/comments/proposals/changes to implement for v0.1.0
Jan 25, 2019
so that v0.1.0 is good enough for other extensions to use.
It's best if other extensions can configure their validators via simple ruby code to provide 1 or more (schema, data) pairs to validate, the static schema can be loaded via yaml files (the abstract, complex helper APIs are provided by this extension to leverage https://github.com/ruby-json-schema/json-schema).
For full control of validators, extensions can implement the
validate
orvalidate_common
,validate_node
methods of the validatorsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: