-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 631
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What to use as replacement for tf_cnn_benchmark in the official tensorflow models #535
Comments
Things have changed over the years. For official models that also train to the correct accuracy and are maintained models/official is the way to go/. https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/official. I think it was 4 years ago, when I also moved on from tf_cnn_benchmarks and really pushed models/official because I felt perf code wasn't as interesting as really nice core models that also preformed out of the box with minimal Flags. The other path are the MLPerf models; but not everyone publishes every model on every platform. I have not been involved in a long time; but MLPerf seems more hardware focused. I did really enjoy all the fun we had with tf_cnn_benchmarks. Good luck finding what you need. |
ok, thanks! |
I see a benchmark branch in Tensorflow official models. Is this suppose to tf_cnn_benchmark replacement?
https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/benchmark
Also, in an issue in this repo it was mentioned to use officials/vision models as alternative
#524 (comment)
Which one to use?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: