You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Vectorz's svd returns a full singular-value decomposition, while the Clatrix core.matrix svd returns reduced singular-value decomposition. The raw Clatrix interface allows you to get the full SVD with optional keyword arguments (:type :full). mikera suggested changing the core.matrix version of Clatrix's svd to return the full version. Would it be OK to add :type :full at line 1756?
Vectorz's
svd
returns a full singular-value decomposition, while the Clatrix core.matrixsvd
returns reduced singular-value decomposition. The raw Clatrix interface allows you to get the full SVD with optional keyword arguments (:type :full
). mikera suggested changing the core.matrix version of Clatrix'ssvd
to return the full version. Would it be OK to add:type :full
at line 1756?Example:
I gather that it's OK for the U and V* matrices to be negated--i.e. the vectorz versions are -1 times the clatrix versions.
(Just noticed a typo in the docstring at line 1204.
:values
is missing the final "s".)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: