We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This one should receive a Uint8Array instead of strings
https://github.com/nemtech/symbol-sdk-typescript-javascript/blob/main/src/core/crypto/KeyPair.ts#L32
There are a couple of untyped methods. Revisit those. KeyPair interface should be used.
Note: I've been testing https://github.com/paulmillr/noble-ed25519. It seems 6x times (or more) faster than tweetnacl. It's also pretty small, just one file. Passes https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nemtech/test-vectors/main/2.test-sign.json tests
We only use tweetnacl for the sign, verify and get public key in the KeyPair.ts class. We could consider replacing tweetnacl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
This one should receive a Uint8Array instead of strings
https://github.com/nemtech/symbol-sdk-typescript-javascript/blob/main/src/core/crypto/KeyPair.ts#L32
There are a couple of untyped methods. Revisit those. KeyPair interface should be used.
Note: I've been testing https://github.com/paulmillr/noble-ed25519. It seems 6x times (or more) faster than tweetnacl. It's also pretty small, just one file. Passes https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nemtech/test-vectors/main/2.test-sign.json tests
We only use tweetnacl for the sign, verify and get public key in the KeyPair.ts class. We could consider replacing tweetnacl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: