Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
315 lines (223 loc) · 9.74 KB

http-status.rest

File metadata and controls

315 lines (223 loc) · 9.74 KB

HTTP Status Codes

This document discusses semantics of HTTP status codes and their use in SUSE Studio APIv3. Irrelevant status codes are omitted.

RFC2616 10.2.2:

The request has been fulfilled and resulted in a new resource being created. The newly created resource can be referenced by the URI(s) returned in the entity of the response, with the most specific URI for the resource given by a Location header field.

The origin server MUST create the resource before returning the 201 status code.

RFC2616, 9.5 POST:

If a resource has been created on the origin server, the response SHOULD be 201 (Created) and contain an entity which describes the status of the request and refers to the new resource, and a Location header (see section 14.30).

RFC2616, 9.6 PUT:

If a new resource is created, the origin server MUST inform the user agent via the 201 (Created) response.

RFC2616 10.2.3:

The request has been accepted for processing, but the processing has not been completed. The request might or might not eventually be acted upon, as it might be disallowed when processing actually takes place.

The entity returned with this response SHOULD include an indication of the request's current status and either a pointer to a status monitor or some estimate of when the user can expect the request to be fulfilled.

RFC2616, 9.7 DELETE:

A successful response SHOULD be [...] 202 (Accepted) if the action has not yet been enacted

RFC2616 10.2.5:

The server has fulfilled the request but does not need to return an entity-body, and might want to return updated metainformation. The response MAY include new or updated metainformation in the form of entity-headers, which if present SHOULD be associated with the requested variant.

The 204 response MUST NOT include a message-body, and thus is always terminated by the first empty line after the header fields.

RFC2616, 9.5 POST:

The action performed by the POST method might not result in a resource that can be identified by a URI. In this case, either 200 (OK) or 204 (No Content) is the appropriate response status.

RFC2616, 9.6 PUT:

If an existing resource is modified, either the 200 (OK) or 204 (No Content) response codes SHOULD be sent to indicate successful completion of the request.

RFC2616, 9.7 DELETE:

A successful response SHOULD be [...] 204 (No Content) if the action has been enacted but the response does not include an entity.

RFC2616 10.3.1:

The requested resource corresponds to any one of a set of representations, each with its own specific location, and agent- driven negotiation information (section 12) is being provided so that the user (or user agent) can select a preferred representation and redirect its request to that location.

If the server has a preferred choice of representation, it SHOULD include the specific URI for that representation in the Location field; user agents MAY use the Location field value for automatic redirection.

RFC2616 10.3.2:

The requested resource has been assigned a new permanent URI and any future references to this resource SHOULD use one of the returned URIs.

The new permanent URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the response.

If the 301 status code is received in response to a request other than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which the request was issued.

RFC2616 10.3.3:

The requested resource resides temporarily under a different URI. Since the redirection might be altered on occasion, the client SHOULD continue to use the Request-URI for future requests. This response is only cacheable if indicated by a Cache-Control or Expires header field.

The temporary URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the response SHOULD contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to the new URI(s).

If the 302 status code is received in response to a request other than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which the request was issued.

RFC2616 10.3.4:

The response to the request can be found under a different URI and SHOULD be retrieved using a GET method on that resource. This method exists primarily to allow the output of a POST-activated script to redirect the user agent to a selected resource. The new URI is not a substitute reference for the originally requested resource.

The different URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the response.

RFC2616 10.3.5:

If the client has performed a conditional GET request and access is allowed, but the document has not been modified, the server SHOULD respond with this status code. The 304 response MUST NOT contain a message-body, and thus is always terminated by the first empty line after the header fields.

RFC2616 10.3.8:

The requested resource resides temporarily under a different URI. Since the redirection MAY be altered on occasion, the client SHOULD continue to use the Request-URI for future requests.

If the 307 status code is received in response to a request other than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which the request was issued.

RFC2616 10.4.1:

The request could not be understood by the server due to malformed syntax. The client SHOULD NOT repeat the request without modifications.

RFC2616 10.4.4:

The server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it. Authorization will not help and the request SHOULD NOT be repeated. If the request method was not HEAD and the server wishes to make public why the request has not been fulfilled, it SHOULD describe the reason for the refusal in the entity. If the server does not wish to make this information available to the client, the status code 404 (Not Found) can be used instead.

RFC2616 10.4.5:

The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI.

The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address. This status code is commonly used when the server does not wish to reveal exactly why the request has been refused, or when no other response is applicable.

RFC2616 10.4.6:

The method specified in the Request-Line is not allowed for the resource identified by the Request-URI. The response MUST include an Allow header containing a list of valid methods for the requested resource.

RFC2616 10.4.7:

The resource identified by the request is only capable of generating response entities which have content characteristics not acceptable according to the accept headers sent in the request.

RFC2616 10.4.10:

The request could not be completed due to a conflict with the current state of the resource. This code is only allowed in situations where it is expected that the user might be able to resolve the conflict and resubmit the request. The response body SHOULD include enough information for the user to recognize the source of the conflict.

For example, if versioning were being used and the entity being PUT included changes to a resource which conflict with those made by an earlier (third-party) request, the server might use the 409 response to indicate that it can't complete the request. In this case, the response entity would likely contain a list of the differences between the two versions in a format defined by the response Content-Type.

RFC2616 10.4.11:

The requested resource is no longer available at the server and no forwarding address is known. This condition is expected to be considered permanent.

It is not necessary to mark all permanently unavailable resources as "gone" or to keep the mark for any length of time -- that is left to the discretion of the server owner.

RFC2616 10.4.12:

The server refuses to accept the request without a defined Content-Length.

RFC2616 10.4.13:

This response code allows the client to place preconditions on the current resource metainformation (header field data) and thus prevent the requested method from being applied to a resource other than the one intended.

RFC2616 10.4.14:

The server is refusing to process a request because the request entity is larger than the server is willing or able to process.

RFC2616 10.4.16:

The server is refusing to service the request because the entity of the request is in a format not supported by the requested resource for the requested method.

[Top]