Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert eye-managed processes to use foreman instead #643

Closed
cbeer opened this issue Jul 26, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #809
Closed

Convert eye-managed processes to use foreman instead #643

cbeer opened this issue Jul 26, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #809
Assignees

Comments

@cbeer
Copy link
Member

cbeer commented Jul 26, 2022

eye is giving us some grief deploying under ruby 3.x (hanging processes, unable to find eye binary, etc). Now that we're in a systemd environment, maybe user-level systemd scripts are the way to go?

See #632 for an example of the weird kind of errors that come up.

@jcoyne
Copy link
Contributor

jcoyne commented Apr 12, 2023

Have you considered having systemd manage Foreman and having Foreman manage all our background jobs?

@thatbudakguy thatbudakguy moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🔖 Ready in Searchworks/FOLIO Summer 2022/23 Apr 20, 2023
@jcoyne jcoyne self-assigned this Apr 21, 2023
@jcoyne jcoyne moved this from 🔖 Ready to 🏗 In progress in Searchworks/FOLIO Summer 2022/23 Apr 21, 2023
@cbeer cbeer changed the title Convert eye-managed processes to user-level systemd Convert eye-managed processes to use foreman instead Apr 21, 2023
@thatbudakguy
Copy link
Member

@jcoyne jcoyne moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in Searchworks/FOLIO Summer 2022/23 May 10, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in Searchworks/FOLIO Summer 2022/23 May 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants