Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clarification regarding likelihood-ratio test in Fixed and Random Effects Models snippet #4

Open
davedgd opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@davedgd
Copy link

davedgd commented Apr 21, 2021

@strengejacke: thank you so much for your awesome examples and packages.

I wanted to bring to your attention a potential question regarding your example here, namely in the section Check if a REWB- or simple RE-model suitable with the following ANOVA comparing fixed effects using REML with glmmTMB: anova(model_re, model_mundlak)

Rather than repeat all the details, perhaps you could take a look at the discussion I've posted here regarding the glmmTMB documentation: glmmTMB/glmmTMB#686. The short version is that LRTs conducted with glmmTMB, unlike lme4::lmer, do not refit models with ML prior to producing the LRT output, which may be an issue with regard to the LRT.

I'm curious about your thoughts/interpretation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant