Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a Dapp Frontend as the last step of Getting Started Guide #945

Open
janewang opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add a Dapp Frontend as the last step of Getting Started Guide #945

janewang opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@janewang
Copy link
Contributor

janewang commented Aug 27, 2024

What problem does your feature solve?

Can't find where is adding a dapp frontend to increment contract

What would you like to see?

Move https://developers.stellar.org/docs/build/apps/dapp-frontend to step 5 of Getting Started guide

@briwylde08
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! So I will explain the reasoning here. When we split the Build tab, we split it between Smart Contracts and Applications. We felt that building a dapp frontend fit better in the Applications section for a user looking for that section specifically.

We do have an Up Next link and pagination that directs users to the dapp frontend guide following the Getting Started section (see screenshot below) to make navigation easier.

dapp frontend

Have there been many issues navigating this? I don't think either @ElliotFriend or I are super married to either flow but this made the most sense to us when splitting the content.

@ElliotFriend
Copy link
Contributor

Anecdotally, at the hackathon I noticed more than one person trying to show me "some part" of the astro template guide they tried to copy and were having trouble with. Pretty much each time, they went to the "getting started" sidebar container, clicked 4-deploy-increment, scrolled to the bottom, and clicked that "build a dapp frontend" Next button.

That suggests to me people may associate the dapp frontend page more with the "getting started" container, and less with the "build applications" container. If that seems to be the general "vibe" of folks, I'd say it makes more sense to put it back into the "getting started" container.

@github-staff github-staff deleted a comment from mayank785 Oct 23, 2024
@github-staff github-staff deleted a comment from mayank785 Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@janewang @ElliotFriend @briwylde08 and others