We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Protocol 22
Try to deploy an asset twice, where the first time it deployed successfully.
❯ stellar contract asset deploy --asset ABC:$(stellar keys address a) ❯ stellar contract asset deploy --asset ABC:$(stellar keys address a)
The second time to display a error that could be understood by the user, where the contract address would be emitted as a C address.
An error with the contract ID displayed as a hex string.
❯ stellar contract asset deploy --asset ABC:$(stellar keys address a) 2024-12-13T08:27:36.552034Z ERROR soroban_cli::assembled: 0: "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAgAAAAAAAAACAAAADwAAAAVlcnJvcgAAAAAAAAIAAAADAAAABAAAABAAAAABAAAAAgAAAA4AAAAXY29udHJhY3QgYWxyZWFkeSBleGlzdHMAAAAADQAAACCxdXaTv6o23MQp63HScGnKh7Hrfn620g/acIXeY3snjg==" ❌ error: transaction simulation failed: HostError: Error(Storage, ExistingValue) Event log (newest first): 0: [Diagnostic Event] topics:[error, Error(Storage, ExistingValue)], data:["contract already exists", Bytes(b1757693bfaa36dcc429eb71d27069ca87b1eb7e7eb6d20fda7085de637b278e)]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
What version are you using?
Protocol 22
What did you do?
Try to deploy an asset twice, where the first time it deployed successfully.
What did you expect to see?
The second time to display a error that could be understood by the user, where the contract address would be emitted as a C address.
What did you see instead?
An error with the contract ID displayed as a hex string.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: