Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we display provenance, binding, or filiation #346

Open
wlpotter opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Should we display provenance, binding, or filiation #346

wlpotter opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@wlpotter
Copy link
Contributor

wlpotter commented Jun 7, 2024

We have very few of these elements in our data, but I don't think we are currently displaying?

Binding example: https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/13#msPart5 (7 examples in our data)

Provenance example: https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/116 (62 examples, most of which just say "See additions")

Filiation example: https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/336 (is currently displaying; only one example)

  • could change to a note. Could decide to move cross-ref bibls to a filiation element
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants