Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add static analysis subcommand #66

Open
louismerlin opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Add static analysis subcommand #66

louismerlin opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@louismerlin
Copy link
Collaborator

We could have a subcommand that could create a dictionary file for the fuzzers, by doing some static analysis on:

  • a path that contains the code, through byte-value and string recovery
  • the compiled runner binary, extracting strings and other helpful values
@louismerlin louismerlin added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 29, 2023
@louismerlin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Maybe using https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/blob/1c582b6aeec034b2c0ef650abd35352df7d78fa7/instrumentation/afl-llvm-dict2file.so.cc

@vanhauser-thc
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe using https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/blob/1c582b6aeec034b2c0ef650abd35352df7d78fa7/instrumentation/afl-llvm-dict2file.so.cc

that will require the cmplog feature flag but is a very good idea to use if that feature is present

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@vanhauser-thc @louismerlin