Should use inclusive naming #593
Labels
Comments
uhthomas
added a commit
to uhthomas/redis-operator
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2023
Replace the terms whitelist and blacklist with allowlist and blocklist respectively. Uses of the term whitelist have been replaced with the more descriptive term "propagateLabels". https://inclusivenaming.org/word-lists/tier-1/whitelist/ Fixes spotahome#593
uhthomas
added a commit
to uhthomas/redis-operator
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2023
Replace the terms whitelist and blacklist with allowlist and blocklist respectively. Uses of the term whitelist have been replaced with the more descriptive term "propagateLabels". https://inclusivenaming.org/word-lists/tier-1/whitelist/ Fixes spotahome#593
uhthomas
added a commit
to uhthomas/redis-operator
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2023
Replace the terms whitelist and blacklist with allowlist and blocklist respectively. Uses of the term whitelist have been replaced with the more descriptive term "propagateLabels". https://inclusivenaming.org/word-lists/tier-1/whitelist/ Fixes spotahome#593
|
This issue is stale because it has been open for 45 days with no activity. |
|
Not stale. |
|
This issue is stale because it has been open for 45 days with no activity. |
|
This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 14 days since being marked as stale. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Expected behaviour
The operator can optionally restrict propagated labels using the
LabelWhitelistfield. Inline with the Inclusive Naming Initiative, this should probably beLabelAllowlistor evenPropagateLabels.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: