-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sfn doesn't resolve ref for output used in nested template (v. 3.0.18) #218
Comments
Are these parameters in the root template that show up like this? What style of nesting do you have configured? |
Yes, those parameters are in the root template. I use the default one (Shallow I think?), I didn't change anything from default when I started using SFN/SparkleFormation so whatever is the default behaviour of |
Any idea on what caused this issue? I haven't retried it yet and have downgraded to my previous sfn version. |
I guess not... |
Hi! Apologies for the delay, some outside forces consumed quite a bit of my time recently. A couple questions regarding this issue as I'm having a hard time reproducing this locally:
Thanks! |
Hey! Welcome back :P We were starting to think you were dead xD (I have 2 accounts sorry) I will ping you tomorrow when I can take a look at my config! Just making sure you don't think I ignore you :p |
So I just tried again and it only applies to sfn update for my top template (all the nested template now have correct attribute) but here's what I get for the TOP template
Nested Template are good
Here's my top template
|
Okay, I've got a reproduction of this behavior going locally so I should have it fixed up soon 😃 |
@chrisroberts how about this one? Any chance it was resolved in the recent release? |
Hey, I currently upgraded SFN from 2.2.0 to 3.0.18 and now on
sfn update/create
I get this:From the template:
and the registry:
and
I can overwrite them at prompt, but no matter what I do EVERY UPDATE will put {REF...} as the default value instead of filling the values from CF (the values are there on the stack in AWS).
Any idea what could cause that? It's only on those parameters. Nested template parameters are resolving correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: