You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, has there been any progress with this?
We are trying to index a Bazel codebase with c++23 enabled and seeing compiler diagnostic errors:
error: invalid value 'c++23' in '-std=c++23'
note: use 'c++98' or 'c++03' for 'ISO C++ 1998 with amendments' standard
note: use 'gnu++98' or 'gnu++03' for 'ISO C++ 1998 with amendments and GNU extensions' standard
note: use 'c++11' for 'ISO C++ 2011 with amendments' standard
note: use 'gnu++11' for 'ISO C++ 2011 with amendments and GNU extensions' standard
note: use 'c++14' for 'ISO C++ 2014 with amendments' standard
note: use 'gnu++14' for 'ISO C++ 2014 with amendments and GNU extensions' standard
note: use 'c++17' for 'ISO C++ 2017 with amendments' standard
note: use 'gnu++17' for 'ISO C++ 2017 with amendments and GNU extensions' standard
note: use 'c++20' for 'ISO C++ 2020 DIS' standard
note: use 'gnu++20' for 'ISO C++ 2020 DIS with GNU extensions' standard
note: use 'c++2b' for 'Working draft for ISO C++ 2023 DIS' standard
note: use 'gnu++2b' for 'Working draft for ISO C++ 2023 DIS with GNU extensions' standard
... later compiler errors about c++23 features e.g. `no member named 'to_underlying' in namespace 'std'`
Is it related to this issue of an old llvm version? Our toolchain is configured with an llvm 17 compiler, but maybe the version used in scip-clang is important.
At the time of writing, we're missing several months worth of changes from upstream.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: