You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It should be possible to specify/overwrite the image quality option. Ideally, it should be possible to specify multiple qualities, e. g. to generate lower-quality for high dpi images.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a must have. It seems by default the image quality is lower than the quality of images generated by f:image/media which is not good. (Re)processing should not manipulate / change the quality by default.
At least the generated images seem to be not as crisp as the normal images and look a bit blurry when you look closely at them.
I'm pretty sure that the image quality is the same because the extension uses the core api for image processing just as the core viewhelpers do. The processing is applied to the original image, so there is no reprocessing which could have added up to bad image quality.
However, responsive images can seem blurrier in the browser because they almost almost always will be scaled by the browsers, which can lead to some quality loss.
It should be possible to specify/overwrite the image quality option. Ideally, it should be possible to specify multiple qualities, e. g. to generate lower-quality for high dpi images.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: