Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

negative false problem #9

Open
mujiezhang opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

negative false problem #9

mujiezhang opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@mujiezhang
Copy link

mujiezhang commented Mar 8, 2023

Hi,
I performed inovirus_detector in Genbank viral genomes, but I found some typical inovirus like M13 and f1 could not be predicted by it. And a total of 53 inovirus were missed among all 338 inovirus in NCBI. Do you have any suggestions to improve the accuracy of prediction? It is strange that M13 and f1 were in your reference dataset but they could not be predicted by inovirus_detector.

@simroux
Copy link
Owner

simroux commented Mar 8, 2023

Hi,

There is no active development on this project, so we won't have any new feature or capability to improve the accuracy of prediction. However, it is a little strange that it is missing M13 and f1. One thing you could double-check what score you get for these sequences, by changing the script "Get_inovirus_prediction_score_from_gff_fragments.pl": on line 11, the default threshold is 0.83. You may want to change this number (e.g. to 0.5), and rerun the pipeline on your test inoviruses, to see if maybe these are detected but with a lower score ?

@mujiezhang
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your suggestion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants