Develop a solution to aid smaller research software projects to expand the diversity of their participants #44
Labels
Activity: Advocacy
This is an activity that involves supporting or promoting a particular research software policy
Activity: Organizing / Action
This involves organizing, capacity building or other practical actions to advance research software
Activity
This is a policy activity
Effort: Small
Less than 1 person-year estimated to deliver this.
Topic: Diversity and Inclusion
Topics relating to diversity, equity, inclusion and justice
Potential Activity Scope
Smaller research software projects face a more limited set of options for improving the diversity of participants/contributors. An initiative to address this may require the following types of steps to address the challenge:
Understanding the Landscape: Begin by conducting an assessment of the current state of diversity within smaller research software projects. This involves identifying the specific dimensions of diversity that need to be addressed, such as gender, ethnicity, age, disability, education, and socio-economic status. Understanding the unique challenges, barriers, and opportunities within this context is crucial.
Engaging Stakeholders: Engage with various stakeholders, including project leaders, participants, diversity and inclusion experts, and community members. Their insights, experiences, and perspectives will inform the development of the solution.
Defining Objectives and Principles: Clearly articulate the objectives and guiding principles of the solution. This includes defining what success looks like, setting measurable goals, and ensuring alignment with broader diversity and inclusion values.
Developing Strategies and Tools: Design specific strategies, tools, and resources that address the identified needs and barriers. This may include creating guidelines, training modules, mentorship programs, recruitment strategies, and community engagement initiatives. Consideration should be given to the unique characteristics and constraints of smaller research software projects.
If sufficient time/resources are available, the following additional steps could be considered:
Piloting the Solution: Implement a pilot version of the solution within selected projects. This allows for testing, refinement, and validation of the approach, ensuring that it is practical, effective, and culturally sensitive.
Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish a robust monitoring and evaluation framework to track progress, assess impact, and identify areas for improvement. This includes defining clear metrics, indicators, and feedback mechanisms.
Scaling and Dissemination: Once a solution has been tested and refined, consider how it can be scaled and disseminated to reach a broader audience. This may involve partnerships with organizations, networks, or platforms that cater to smaller research software projects.
Sustaining the Effort: Consider the sustainability of the solution, ensuring that it can be maintained and adapted over time. This may involve creating a community of practice, securing ongoing funding, or integrating the solution into existing diversity and inclusion initiatives.
Potential Objectives
Targeted Impacts
This potential activity was curated as part of "Charting the Course: Policy and Planning for Sustainable Research Software," a Sloan Foundation-funded project within URSSI dedicated to supporting the future of research software through evidence-informed policy work (Project contacts are: @danielskatz and @dr-eric-jensen). If you are interested in working on this, please add a comment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: