forked from ThomasKaiser/sbc-bench
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
3Wvv.txt
639 lines (548 loc) · 34.2 KB
/
3Wvv.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
sbc-bench v0.9.4 Khadas VIM4 (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 03:01:58 +0800)
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
Release: 20.04
Codename: focal
Architecture: arm64
/usr/bin/gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1) 9.4.0
Uptime: 03:01:59 up 3:54, 2 users, load average: 2.45, 2.23, 2.22
Linux 5.4.125 (Khadas) 04/29/22 _aarch64_ (8 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
9.11 1.65 0.60 0.03 0.00 88.62
Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd
mmcblk0 2.13 80.09 33.18 0.00 1126777 466856 0
mmcblk0boot0 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 232 0 0
mmcblk0boot1 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 232 0 0
sda 2.55 90.71 0.00 0.00 1276162 0 0
sdb 0.04 0.89 0.00 0.00 12464 0 0
zram1 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 1176 4 0
zram2 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 1176 4 0
zram3 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 1176 4 0
zram4 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 1176 4 0
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 7.8Gi 950Mi 6.5Gi 59Mi 386Mi 6.7Gi
Swap: 1.0Gi 0B 1.0Gi
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/zram1 partition 262140 0 5
/dev/zram2 partition 262140 0 5
/dev/zram3 partition 262140 0 5
/dev/zram4 partition 262140 0 5
##########################################################################
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu0-cpu3 (Cortex-A73):
Cpufreq OPP: 2208 Measured: 2205 (2200.901/2200.157/2199.438)
Cpufreq OPP: 2016 Measured: 2010 (2008.569/2007.595/2007.570)
Cpufreq OPP: 1896 Measured: 1890 (1887.733/1881.637/1881.374)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1795 (1792.555/1792.117/1791.838)
Cpufreq OPP: 1704 Measured: 1700 (1696.559/1696.291/1696.113)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1605 (1600.702/1599.571/1598.403)
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1510 (1506.541/1503.226/1503.156)
Cpufreq OPP: 1392 Measured: 1390 (1385.797/1383.629/1378.710)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1195 (1193.427/1193.413/1191.719)
Cpufreq OPP: 1000 Measured: 995 (994.027/993.477/993.203)
Cpufreq OPP: 666 Measured: 665 (661.281/660.694/659.755)
Cpufreq OPP: 500 Measured: 495 (494.773/493.302/493.296)
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu4-cpu7 (Cortex-A53):
Cpufreq OPP: 2016 Measured: 1975 (1974.804/1963.179/1962.415)
Cpufreq OPP: 1896 Measured: 1855 (1854.356/1853.803/1853.781)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1765 (1761.182/1760.837/1756.831)
Cpufreq OPP: 1704 Measured: 1670 (1668.913/1665.332/1664.851)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1575 (1574.605/1574.067/1564.816)
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1480 (1478.594/1477.765/1476.616)
Cpufreq OPP: 1392 Measured: 1360 (1358.877/1358.048/1357.691)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1175 (1171.063/1171.023/1167.939)
Cpufreq OPP: 1000 Measured: 980 (975.419/974.878/972.172)
Cpufreq OPP: 666 Measured: 655 (650.408/649.649/646.426)
Cpufreq OPP: 500 Measured: 485 (484.829/484.729/484.435)
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark on cpu0 (Cortex-A73):
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 7783.4 MB/s (0.3%)
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 7781.6 MB/s
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 7805.9 MB/s
C copy : 7823.4 MB/s
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 7591.3 MB/s
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 7626.1 MB/s
C 2-pass copy : 4121.2 MB/s (0.3%)
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 3712.4 MB/s (0.2%)
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 3807.5 MB/s (0.2%)
C fill : 11602.6 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 11596.9 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 11592.5 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 11594.0 MB/s
---
standard memcpy : 7806.0 MB/s
standard memset : 11595.7 MB/s
---
NEON LDP/STP copy : 7811.6 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 7811.9 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 7812.2 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 7555.6 MB/s (0.4%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 7729.1 MB/s (0.3%)
NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 7802.7 MB/s
NEON STP fill : 11595.6 MB/s
NEON STNP fill : 11597.1 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy : 7805.7 MB/s
ARM STP fill : 11595.6 MB/s
ARM STNP fill : 11593.5 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 459.8 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 395.6 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 459.8 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 395.1 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 459.8 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 395.4 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 5.0 ns / 8.4 ns
131072 : 7.5 ns / 11.8 ns
262144 : 9.4 ns / 13.2 ns
524288 : 10.9 ns / 13.8 ns
1048576 : 25.4 ns / 38.2 ns
2097152 : 77.2 ns / 112.9 ns
4194304 : 107.0 ns / 139.8 ns
8388608 : 125.4 ns / 154.6 ns
16777216 : 135.5 ns / 160.4 ns
33554432 : 141.8 ns / 164.1 ns
67108864 : 145.7 ns / 166.2 ns
Executing benchmark on cpu4 (Cortex-A53):
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 2098.9 MB/s
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2112.2 MB/s
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2133.1 MB/s (0.2%)
C copy : 2136.7 MB/s
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1443.4 MB/s
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 1647.8 MB/s
C 2-pass copy : 1797.3 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1230.0 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 1061.4 MB/s
C fill : 10600.0 MB/s (0.2%)
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 10573.3 MB/s (0.2%)
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 10545.3 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 10524.2 MB/s
---
standard memcpy : 2136.7 MB/s
standard memset : 10604.5 MB/s (0.2%)
---
NEON LDP/STP copy : 2102.4 MB/s (0.2%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 1295.4 MB/s (0.8%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 1669.4 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2575.8 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2576.9 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2124.6 MB/s
NEON STP fill : 10601.5 MB/s (0.2%)
NEON STNP fill : 7980.4 MB/s (1.0%)
ARM LDP/STP copy : 2103.0 MB/s (0.2%)
ARM STP fill : 10636.4 MB/s (0.2%)
ARM STNP fill : 7965.9 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 258.2 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 245.3 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 64.6 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 64.6 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 129.2 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 129.2 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 3.5 ns / 5.9 ns
131072 : 5.3 ns / 8.2 ns
262144 : 6.3 ns / 9.1 ns
524288 : 6.8 ns / 9.6 ns
1048576 : 16.7 ns / 29.2 ns
2097152 : 73.7 ns / 110.4 ns
4194304 : 109.0 ns / 144.0 ns
8388608 : 127.3 ns / 156.8 ns
16777216 : 137.6 ns / 163.3 ns
33554432 : 143.8 ns / 167.3 ns
67108864 : 147.4 ns / 169.2 ns
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark on each cluster individually
OpenSSL 1.1.1f, built on 31 Mar 2020
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
aes-128-cbc 372296.62k 931836.89k 1439260.07k 1657040.21k 1745892.69k 1752208.73k
aes-128-cbc 165909.42k 498410.75k 980026.28k 1325002.75k 1476392.28k 1486389.25k
aes-192-cbc 346540.37k 842767.85k 1216763.14k 1392323.24k 1456070.66k 1461141.50k
aes-192-cbc 158402.30k 445109.06k 801854.21k 1022547.63k 1111769.09k 1117508.95k
aes-256-cbc 335080.27k 769007.83k 1079949.99k 1202499.93k 1249596.76k 1253195.78k
aes-256-cbc 153772.05k 409639.74k 695675.82k 855945.56k 917585.92k 921468.93k
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark single-threaded on cpu0 (Cortex-A73)
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,8 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 64000000 32000000 32000000 32000000 128000000 256000000 512000000 512000000 1024000000
RAM size: 7951 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 8
RAM usage: 435 MB, # Benchmark threads: 1
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 1826 99 1793 1777 | 28589 99 2458 2441
23: 1730 99 1780 1763 | 27980 99 2440 2422
24: 1631 99 1771 1754 | 27352 99 2419 2401
25: 1509 99 1740 1723 | 26555 99 2381 2364
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 99 1771 1754 | 99 2425 2407
Tot: 99 2098 2081
Executing benchmark single-threaded on cpu4 (Cortex-A53)
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,8 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 32000000 64000000 64000000 21333333 128000000 256000000 512000000 1024000000 682666666
RAM size: 7951 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 8
RAM usage: 435 MB, # Benchmark threads: 1
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 1200 97 1198 1168 | 21964 98 1920 1875
23: 1128 97 1179 1150 | 21482 98 1904 1860
24: 1083 97 1196 1165 | 21017 98 1889 1845
25: 1033 97 1211 1180 | 20448 98 1864 1820
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 97 1196 1166 | 98 1894 1850
Tot: 98 1545 1508
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark 3 times multi-threaded
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,8 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 32000000 32000000 32000000 32000000 128000000 128000000 256000000 - 2048000000
RAM size: 7951 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 8
RAM usage: 1765 MB, # Benchmark threads: 8
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 9411 746 1227 9155 | 179430 712 2148 15305
23: 8646 720 1223 8810 | 174950 711 2129 15140
24: 8618 765 1211 9266 | 170495 711 2103 14964
25: 8087 752 1228 9234 | 165775 714 2068 14753
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 746 1222 9116 | 712 2112 15040
Tot: 729 1667 12078
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,8 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 64000000 - 64000000 - - - 512000000 - 2048000000
RAM size: 7951 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 8
RAM usage: 1765 MB, # Benchmark threads: 8
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 9427 738 1243 9171 | 179872 714 2149 15342
23: 9027 753 1221 9198 | 174902 712 2126 15136
24: 8523 753 1217 9164 | 171443 715 2104 15047
25: 8229 763 1232 9396 | 166209 715 2069 14792
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 752 1228 9232 | 714 2112 15079
Tot: 733 1670 12156
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,8 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 64000000 64000000 64000000 64000000 128000000 256000000 256000000 1024000000 2048000000
RAM size: 7951 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 8
RAM usage: 1765 MB, # Benchmark threads: 8
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 9186 722 1237 8936 | 180010 715 2147 15354
23: 8668 728 1213 8832 | 175735 715 2127 15208
24: 8344 731 1227 8972 | 171381 715 2103 15042
25: 8068 748 1231 9213 | 166486 716 2071 14817
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 732 1227 8988 | 715 2112 15105
Tot: 724 1670 12047
Compression: 9116,9232,8988
Decompression: 15040,15079,15105
Total: 12078,12156,12047
##########################################################################
Testing clockspeeds again. System health now:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
03:18:37: 2208/2016MHz 9.92 93% 1% 91% 0% 0% 0% 52.5°C
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu0-cpu3 (Cortex-A73):
Cpufreq OPP: 2208 Measured: 2200 (2196.158/2183.301/2125.792)
Cpufreq OPP: 2016 Measured: 1680 (1678.371/1612.091/1603.220)
Cpufreq OPP: 1896 Measured: 1880 (1878.287/1875.646/1875.624)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1785 (1780.729/1079.439/962.358)
Cpufreq OPP: 1704 Measured: 1690 (1686.236/1629.835/1515.309)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1595 (1593.413/1591.410/1588.845)
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1495 (1491.988/1471.870/1403.785)
Cpufreq OPP: 1392 Measured: 1380 (1378.033/1377.945/1376.990)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1190 (1187.391/1186.423/511.921)
Cpufreq OPP: 1000 Measured: 1085 (1080.209/988.948/983.721)
Cpufreq OPP: 666 Measured: 475 (472.587/263.852/263.343)
Cpufreq OPP: 500 Measured: 490 (489.038/194.918/192.142)
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu4-cpu7 (Cortex-A53):
Cpufreq OPP: 2016 Measured: 1970 (1966.777/1965.280/1956.200)
Cpufreq OPP: 1896 Measured: 1860 (1857.237/1840.612/1769.911)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1810 (1805.104/1760.529/1749.879)
Cpufreq OPP: 1704 Measured: 1665 (1663.170/1657.176/1599.011)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1580 (1579.889/1568.643/1477.657)
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1480 (1476.337/1475.994/1210.381)
Cpufreq OPP: 1392 Measured: 1350 (1347.039/836.452/781.693)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1175 (1174.765/1149.625/1024.831)
Cpufreq OPP: 1000 Measured: 980 (978.491/973.500/970.847)
Cpufreq OPP: 666 Measured: 650 (649.633/645.109/644.677)
Cpufreq OPP: 500 Measured: 490 (485.202/485.046/484.946)
##########################################################################
Thermal source: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone0/ (soc_thermal)
System health while running tinymembench:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
03:02:16: 2208/2016MHz 2.57 11% 0% 9% 1% 0% 0% 45.8°C
03:03:36: 2208/2016MHz 2.91 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 47.7°C
03:04:56: 2208/2016MHz 3.53 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 45.9°C
03:06:16: 2208/2016MHz 3.32 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 46.7°C
03:07:36: 2208/2016MHz 3.37 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.7°C
03:08:56: 2208/2016MHz 3.29 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.1°C
03:10:16: 2208/2016MHz 3.12 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.0°C
System health while running OpenSSL benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
03:10:22: 2208/2016MHz 3.11 11% 0% 9% 1% 0% 0% 51.0°C
03:10:38: 2208/2016MHz 3.14 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 51.1°C
03:10:54: 2208/2016MHz 3.11 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 45.9°C
03:11:10: 2208/2016MHz 3.22 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 48.6°C
03:11:26: 2208/2016MHz 3.17 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 47.2°C
03:11:42: 2208/2016MHz 3.13 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 51.6°C
03:11:58: 2208/2016MHz 3.16 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.5°C
System health while running 7-zip single core benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
03:12:10: 2208/2016MHz 3.13 11% 0% 9% 1% 0% 0% 51.4°C
03:12:20: 2208/2016MHz 3.11 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 52.8°C
03:12:30: 2208/2016MHz 3.17 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 53.1°C
03:12:40: 2208/2016MHz 3.15 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 52.2°C
03:12:50: 2208/2016MHz 3.12 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.4°C
03:13:00: 2208/2016MHz 3.10 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 48.7°C
03:13:10: 2208/2016MHz 3.09 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 48.4°C
03:13:20: 2208/2016MHz 3.07 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.7°C
03:13:30: 2208/2016MHz 3.06 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 48.4°C
03:13:40: 2208/2016MHz 3.05 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.1°C
03:13:50: 2208/2016MHz 3.12 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.9°C
03:14:00: 2208/2016MHz 3.10 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 50.3°C
03:14:10: 2208/2016MHz 3.09 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 49.9°C
03:14:20: 2208/2016MHz 3.07 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 47.8°C
03:14:30: 2208/2016MHz 3.06 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 46.2°C
03:14:40: 2208/2016MHz 3.05 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 45.8°C
03:14:50: 2208/2016MHz 3.04 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 46.7°C
03:15:01: 2208/2016MHz 3.04 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 47.4°C
System health while running 7-zip multi core benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
03:15:05: 2208/2016MHz 3.03 11% 0% 9% 1% 0% 0% 48.6°C
03:15:16: 2208/2016MHz 3.76 84% 0% 82% 0% 0% 0% 57.9°C
03:15:27: 2208/2016MHz 4.72 86% 0% 85% 0% 0% 0% 56.7°C
03:15:38: 2208/2016MHz 6.28 86% 0% 85% 0% 0% 0% 55.2°C
03:15:48: 2208/2016MHz 6.85 97% 1% 96% 0% 0% 0% 55.8°C
03:15:59: 2208/2016MHz 6.98 80% 1% 78% 0% 0% 0% 52.9°C
03:16:10: 2208/2016MHz 7.67 93% 1% 90% 0% 0% 0% 52.9°C
03:16:20: 2208/2016MHz 7.47 81% 0% 80% 0% 0% 0% 52.7°C
03:16:30: 2208/2016MHz 8.01 96% 0% 95% 0% 0% 0% 54.4°C
03:16:41: 2208/2016MHz 7.80 87% 0% 86% 0% 0% 0% 54.1°C
03:16:52: 2208/2016MHz 8.22 86% 1% 84% 0% 0% 0% 51.7°C
03:17:02: 2208/2016MHz 8.57 90% 0% 89% 0% 0% 0% 52.8°C
03:17:12: 2208/2016MHz 8.43 85% 1% 82% 0% 0% 0% 51.0°C
03:17:23: 2208/2016MHz 8.83 95% 1% 93% 0% 0% 0% 53.0°C
03:17:34: 2208/2016MHz 9.12 76% 0% 75% 0% 0% 0% 52.0°C
03:17:44: 2208/2016MHz 9.01 87% 0% 86% 0% 0% 0% 47.9°C
03:17:55: 2208/2016MHz 9.39 94% 0% 93% 0% 0% 0% 53.3°C
03:18:05: 2208/2016MHz 9.13 84% 1% 81% 0% 0% 0% 47.8°C
03:18:15: 2208/2016MHz 9.34 78% 0% 77% 0% 0% 0% 45.7°C
03:18:26: 2208/2016MHz 9.91 97% 2% 94% 0% 0% 0% 50.5°C
03:18:37: 2208/2016MHz 9.92 93% 1% 91% 0% 0% 0% 52.5°C
##########################################################################
Linux 5.4.125 (Khadas) 04/29/22 _aarch64_ (8 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
10.47 1.54 0.60 0.03 0.00 87.36
Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd
mmcblk0 2.06 75.77 34.81 0.00 1143157 525172 0
mmcblk0boot0 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 232 0 0
mmcblk0boot1 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 232 0 0
sda 2.38 84.59 0.00 0.00 1276162 0 0
sdb 0.03 0.83 0.00 0.00 12464 0 0
zram1 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 1176 4 0
zram2 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 1176 4 0
zram3 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 1176 4 0
zram4 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 1176 4 0
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 7.8Gi 1.0Gi 6.4Gi 72Mi 425Mi 6.6Gi
Swap: 1.0Gi 0B 1.0Gi
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/zram1 partition 262140 0 5
/dev/zram2 partition 262140 0 5
/dev/zram3 partition 262140 0 5
/dev/zram4 partition 262140 0 5
CPU sysfs topology (clusters, cpufreq members, clockspeeds)
cpufreq min max
CPU cluster policy speed speed core type
0 0 0 500 2208 Cortex-A73 / r0p2
1 0 0 500 2208 Cortex-A73 / r0p2
2 0 0 500 2208 Cortex-A73 / r0p2
3 0 0 500 2208 Cortex-A73 / r0p2
4 1 4 500 2016 Cortex-A53 / r0p4
5 1 4 500 2016 Cortex-A53 / r0p4
6 1 4 500 2016 Cortex-A53 / r0p4
7 1 4 500 2016 Cortex-A53 / r0p4
Architecture: aarch64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 8
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 4
Socket(s): 2
Vendor ID: ARM
Model: 2
Model name: Cortex-A73
Stepping: r0p2
CPU max MHz: 2208.0000
CPU min MHz: 500.0000
BogoMIPS: 48.00
Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected
Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected
Vulnerability Mds: Not affected
Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected
Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Vulnerable
Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; __user pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2: Vulnerable
Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected
Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
Flags: fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 cpuid
SoC guess: Amlogic A311D2
Compiler: /usr/bin/gcc (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04.1/aarch64-linux-gnu)
Userland: arm64
Kernel: 5.4.125/aarch64
CONFIG_HZ=250
CONFIG_HZ_250=y
CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
raid6: neonx8 gen() 3014 MB/s
raid6: neonx8 xor() 2814 MB/s
raid6: neonx4 gen() 2440 MB/s
raid6: neonx4 xor() 2859 MB/s
raid6: neonx2 gen() 2276 MB/s
raid6: neonx2 xor() 2516 MB/s
raid6: neonx1 gen() 1839 MB/s
raid6: neonx1 xor() 1947 MB/s
raid6: int64x8 gen() 1788 MB/s
raid6: int64x8 xor() 1107 MB/s
raid6: int64x4 gen() 1429 MB/s
raid6: int64x4 xor() 1051 MB/s
raid6: int64x2 gen() 1154 MB/s
raid6: int64x2 xor() 929 MB/s
raid6: int64x1 gen() 771 MB/s
raid6: int64x1 xor() 728 MB/s
raid6: using algorithm neonx8 gen() 3014 MB/s
raid6: .... xor() 2814 MB/s, rmw enabled
raid6: using neon recovery algorithm
xor: measuring software checksum speed
xor: using function: 32regs (5680.000 MB/sec)
| Khadas VIM4 | 2208/2016 MHz | 5.4 | Focal arm64 | 12090 | 372300 | 1253200 | 7810 | 11600 | - |