forked from ThomasKaiser/sbc-bench
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
3R1a.txt
694 lines (600 loc) · 35.9 KB
/
3R1a.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
sbc-bench v0.9.3 Hardkernel ODROID-N2Plus (Mon, 28 Feb 2022 18:03:51 +0100)
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
Release: 20.04
Codename: focal
Armbian release info:
BOARD=odroidn2
BOARD_NAME="Odroid N2"
BOARDFAMILY=meson-g12b
BUILD_REPOSITORY_URL=https://github.com/armbian/build
BUILD_REPOSITORY_COMMIT=d7794cc7b-dirty
VERSION=21.08.8
LINUXFAMILY=meson64
ARCH=arm64
IMAGE_TYPE=user-built
BOARD_TYPE=conf
INITRD_ARCH=arm64
KERNEL_IMAGE_TYPE=Image
BRANCH=current
/usr/bin/gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0
Uptime: 18:03:51 up 5 min, 2 users, load average: 0,48, 0,20, 0,07
Linux 5.10.81-meson64 (nas003) 28.02.2022 _aarch64_ (6 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
2,45 0,00 1,80 0,11 0,00 95,63
Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd
mmcblk1 26,63 1268,39 351,18 0,00 431405 119444 0
mmcblk1boot0 0,17 0,68 0,00 0,00 232 0 0
mmcblk1boot1 0,17 0,68 0,00 0,00 232 0 0
zram0 1,67 6,68 0,01 0,00 2272 4 0
zram1 0,62 1,33 5,30 0,00 452 1804 0
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3,7Gi 164Mi 3,4Gi 10Mi 191Mi 3,5Gi
Swap: 1,9Gi 0B 1,9Gi
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/zram0 partition 1953764 0 5
##########################################################################
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu0-cpu1 (Cortex-A53):
Cpufreq OPP: 2016 Measured: 2015 (2011.773/2013.781/2011.673)
Cpufreq OPP: 1908 Measured: 1910 (1905.539/1901.790/1905.697)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1800 (1797.485/1797.505/1795.886)
Cpufreq OPP: 1704 Measured: 1705 (1701.782/1701.046/1701.800)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1610 (1605.738/1605.778/1605.857)
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1500 (1497.768/1497.664/1496.102)
Cpufreq OPP: 1398 Measured: 1395 (1393.289/1395.698/1394.447)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1200 (1198.425/1198.758/1195.415)
Cpufreq OPP: 1000 Measured: 1000 (997.880/997.735/997.675)
Cpufreq OPP: 667 Measured: 665 (664.322/663.562/664.442)
Cpufreq OPP: 500 Measured: 500 (497.771/498.281/498.457)
Cpufreq OPP: 250 Measured: 250 (247.840/247.040/247.902)
Cpufreq OPP: 100 Measured: 100 (98.053/97.918/98.210)
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu2-cpu5 (Cortex-A73):
Cpufreq OPP: 2400 Measured: 2400 (2398.488/2398.859/2398.602)
Cpufreq OPP: 2304 Measured: 2305 (2303.049/2302.339/2302.760)
Cpufreq OPP: 2208 Measured: 2210 (2206.654/2206.751/2206.147)
Cpufreq OPP: 2108 Measured: 2100 (2098.661/2099.054/2098.705)
Cpufreq OPP: 2016 Measured: 2015 (2014.535/2014.736/2014.636)
Cpufreq OPP: 1908 Measured: 1910 (1906.710/1906.800/1906.304)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1800 (1798.767/1798.767/1798.868)
Cpufreq OPP: 1704 Measured: 1705 (1702.536/1702.931/1702.697)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1610 (1606.517/1606.797/1606.817)
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1500 (1498.864/1499.194/1498.864)
Cpufreq OPP: 1398 Measured: 1400 (1396.770/1396.770/1396.921)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1200 (1198.786/1198.995/1198.884)
Cpufreq OPP: 1000 Measured: 1000 (999.026/998.591/998.893)
Cpufreq OPP: 667 Measured: 670 (665.559/665.626/665.727)
Cpufreq OPP: 500 Measured: 500 (498.862/499.145/498.886)
Cpufreq OPP: 250 Measured: 250 (249.042/248.790/249.045)
Cpufreq OPP: 100 Measured: 100 (98.940/98.725/98.878)
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark on cpu0 (Cortex-A53):
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 2010.7 MB/s (2.0%)
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 2037.2 MB/s (1.1%)
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 2024.1 MB/s (1.0%)
C copy : 2106.9 MB/s (0.8%)
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1594.6 MB/s (0.3%)
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 1830.6 MB/s
C 2-pass copy : 1853.2 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 1343.0 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 1156.3 MB/s
C fill : 7685.7 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 7683.9 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 7682.6 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 7682.9 MB/s
---
standard memcpy : 2159.1 MB/s (0.6%)
standard memset : 7689.5 MB/s
---
NEON LDP/STP copy : 2185.8 MB/s (0.1%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 1423.5 MB/s (1.0%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 1823.5 MB/s (0.3%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 2425.9 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 2422.8 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 2151.0 MB/s (0.5%)
NEON STP fill : 7689.7 MB/s
NEON STNP fill : 6306.7 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy : 2179.9 MB/s
ARM STP fill : 7689.8 MB/s
ARM STNP fill : 6308.9 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 243.2 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 262.0 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 70.4 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 73.0 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 135.1 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 137.1 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_NOHUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 3.4 ns / 5.7 ns
131072 : 5.2 ns / 8.0 ns
262144 : 6.5 ns / 9.5 ns
524288 : 60.6 ns / 95.2 ns
1048576 : 92.9 ns / 127.1 ns
2097152 : 109.1 ns / 138.1 ns
4194304 : 122.3 ns / 145.3 ns
8388608 : 129.4 ns / 149.6 ns
16777216 : 133.9 ns / 153.1 ns
33554432 : 137.0 ns / 155.8 ns
67108864 : 155.9 ns / 192.8 ns
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_HUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 3.4 ns / 5.7 ns
131072 : 5.2 ns / 8.0 ns
262144 : 6.4 ns / 9.4 ns
524288 : 61.3 ns / 97.3 ns
1048576 : 94.4 ns / 131.7 ns
2097152 : 108.8 ns / 137.8 ns
4194304 : 116.8 ns / 141.5 ns
8388608 : 120.9 ns / 143.0 ns
16777216 : 123.0 ns / 143.5 ns
33554432 : 124.1 ns / 143.7 ns
67108864 : 124.5 ns / 143.8 ns
Executing benchmark on cpu2 (Cortex-A73):
tinymembench v0.4.9 (simple benchmark for memory throughput and latency)
==========================================================================
== Memory bandwidth tests ==
== ==
== Note 1: 1MB = 1000000 bytes ==
== Note 2: Results for 'copy' tests show how many bytes can be ==
== copied per second (adding together read and writen ==
== bytes would have provided twice higher numbers) ==
== Note 3: 2-pass copy means that we are using a small temporary buffer ==
== to first fetch data into it, and only then write it to the ==
== destination (source -> L1 cache, L1 cache -> destination) ==
== Note 4: If sample standard deviation exceeds 0.1%, it is shown in ==
== brackets ==
==========================================================================
C copy backwards : 3965.1 MB/s
C copy backwards (32 byte blocks) : 3965.8 MB/s
C copy backwards (64 byte blocks) : 3962.4 MB/s
C copy : 4027.9 MB/s
C copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 4012.5 MB/s
C copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 4024.4 MB/s
C 2-pass copy : 3153.4 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (32 bytes step) : 2917.1 MB/s
C 2-pass copy prefetched (64 bytes step) : 2978.8 MB/s
C fill : 7117.6 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 16 byte blocks) : 7117.5 MB/s
C fill (shuffle within 32 byte blocks) : 7110.1 MB/s (0.5%)
C fill (shuffle within 64 byte blocks) : 7117.0 MB/s
---
standard memcpy : 4027.3 MB/s
standard memset : 7117.6 MB/s
---
NEON LDP/STP copy : 4036.0 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (32 bytes step) : 4036.5 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl2strm (64 bytes step) : 4035.8 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (32 bytes step) : 3887.2 MB/s (0.2%)
NEON LDP/STP copy pldl1keep (64 bytes step) : 4005.5 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy : 4036.1 MB/s
NEON STP fill : 7118.3 MB/s
NEON STNP fill : 7115.8 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy : 4035.6 MB/s
ARM STP fill : 7121.0 MB/s
ARM STNP fill : 7118.7 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Framebuffer read tests. ==
== ==
== Many ARM devices use a part of the system memory as the framebuffer, ==
== typically mapped as uncached but with write-combining enabled. ==
== Writes to such framebuffers are quite fast, but reads are much ==
== slower and very sensitive to the alignment and the selection of ==
== CPU instructions which are used for accessing memory. ==
== ==
== Many x86 systems allocate the framebuffer in the GPU memory, ==
== accessible for the CPU via a relatively slow PCI-E bus. Moreover, ==
== PCI-E is asymmetric and handles reads a lot worse than writes. ==
== ==
== If uncached framebuffer reads are reasonably fast (at least 100 MB/s ==
== or preferably >300 MB/s), then using the shadow framebuffer layer ==
== is not necessary in Xorg DDX drivers, resulting in a nice overall ==
== performance improvement. For example, the xf86-video-fbturbo DDX ==
== uses this trick. ==
==========================================================================
NEON LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 422.0 MB/s
NEON LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 433.8 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 copy (from framebuffer) : 422.0 MB/s
NEON LD1/ST1 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 433.7 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP copy (from framebuffer) : 421.4 MB/s
ARM LDP/STP 2-pass copy (from framebuffer) : 424.7 MB/s
==========================================================================
== Memory latency test ==
== ==
== Average time is measured for random memory accesses in the buffers ==
== of different sizes. The larger is the buffer, the more significant ==
== are relative contributions of TLB, L1/L2 cache misses and SDRAM ==
== accesses. For extremely large buffer sizes we are expecting to see ==
== page table walk with several requests to SDRAM for almost every ==
== memory access (though 64MiB is not nearly large enough to experience ==
== this effect to its fullest). ==
== ==
== Note 1: All the numbers are representing extra time, which needs to ==
== be added to L1 cache latency. The cycle timings for L1 cache ==
== latency can be usually found in the processor documentation. ==
== Note 2: Dual random read means that we are simultaneously performing ==
== two independent memory accesses at a time. In the case if ==
== the memory subsystem can't handle multiple outstanding ==
== requests, dual random read has the same timings as two ==
== single reads performed one after another. ==
==========================================================================
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_NOHUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 4.6 ns / 7.7 ns
131072 : 6.9 ns / 10.8 ns
262144 : 8.6 ns / 12.1 ns
524288 : 10.0 ns / 12.6 ns
1048576 : 20.8 ns / 31.5 ns
2097152 : 72.0 ns / 107.8 ns
4194304 : 102.4 ns / 136.3 ns
8388608 : 120.8 ns / 151.9 ns
16777216 : 130.6 ns / 158.8 ns
33554432 : 136.6 ns / 161.8 ns
67108864 : 140.2 ns / 163.1 ns
block size : single random read / dual random read, [MADV_HUGEPAGE]
1024 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
2048 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
4096 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
8192 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
16384 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
32768 : 0.0 ns / 0.0 ns
65536 : 4.6 ns / 7.7 ns
131072 : 6.9 ns / 10.8 ns
262144 : 8.1 ns / 12.1 ns
524288 : 8.7 ns / 12.7 ns
1048576 : 9.4 ns / 13.6 ns
2097152 : 70.6 ns / 106.2 ns
4194304 : 100.5 ns / 133.9 ns
8388608 : 114.9 ns / 143.2 ns
16777216 : 121.7 ns / 146.7 ns
33554432 : 125.1 ns / 148.4 ns
67108864 : 127.2 ns / 149.4 ns
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark on each cluster individually
OpenSSL 1.1.1f, built on 31 Mar 2020
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
aes-128-cbc 169534.71k 509311.32k 1001575.00k 1354197.67k 1505850.71k 1498076.50k
aes-128-cbc 381931.24k 973243.67k 1543013.55k 1798098.60k 1902840.49k 1910816.77k
aes-192-cbc 161882.62k 454322.01k 819502.17k 1045066.41k 1134458.20k 1126804.14k
aes-192-cbc 378103.22k 920964.33k 1314877.27k 1518417.92k 1588584.45k 1593748.14k
aes-256-cbc 157125.10k 419234.15k 710976.43k 874803.88k 937716.39k 940933.12k
aes-256-cbc 365493.89k 841974.93k 1184907.61k 1311380.48k 1362963.11k 1366731.43k
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark single-threaded on cpu0 (Cortex-A53)
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 32000000 - - - 128000000 256000000 512000000 - -
RAM size: 3815 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 435 MB, # Benchmark threads: 1
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 1167 99 1144 1136 | 21755 100 1866 1857
23: 1155 99 1185 1177 | 21259 100 1849 1840
24: 1141 99 1236 1228 | 20823 99 1837 1828
25: 1131 99 1301 1292 | 20432 100 1828 1819
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 99 1217 1208 | 100 1845 1836
Tot: 99 1531 1522
Executing benchmark single-threaded on cpu2 (Cortex-A73)
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: - - - 64000000 - - - - 2048000000
RAM size: 3815 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 435 MB, # Benchmark threads: 1
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 2034 100 1984 1979 | 31480 100 2691 2688
23: 1997 100 2041 2035 | 30809 100 2670 2667
24: 1966 100 2120 2114 | 30161 100 2651 2648
25: 1946 100 2228 2222 | 29462 100 2625 2622
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 100 2093 2088 | 100 2659 2656
Tot: 100 2376 2372
##########################################################################
Executing benchmark 3 times multi-threaded
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: - - - - - 256000000 512000000 - -
RAM size: 3815 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 1323 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 7455 563 1289 7253 | 140679 509 2356 11997
23: 7340 574 1304 7479 | 137548 510 2335 11902
24: 7104 567 1346 7639 | 133444 505 2321 11713
25: 7003 571 1400 7996 | 131183 507 2303 11675
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 569 1335 7592 | 508 2329 11822
Tot: 538 1832 9707
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 64000000 - - 64000000 128000000 256000000 - 1024000000 2048000000
RAM size: 3815 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 1323 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 7538 566 1297 7334 | 139759 506 2357 11919
23: 7175 563 1300 7311 | 136562 506 2337 11817
24: 7103 568 1344 7638 | 133783 507 2318 11742
25: 6977 567 1406 7966 | 131124 506 2304 11669
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 566 1337 7562 | 506 2329 11787
Tot: 536 1833 9675
7-Zip (a) [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=C,Utf16=off,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,6 CPUs LE)
LE
CPU Freq: 64000000 64000000 - - - 256000000 - - -
RAM size: 3815 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 6
RAM usage: 1323 MB, # Benchmark threads: 6
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 7385 564 1273 7185 | 139911 505 2361 11932
23: 7030 561 1276 7163 | 137013 506 2342 11856
24: 6894 565 1312 7413 | 134478 508 2321 11803
25: 7045 572 1407 8044 | 131977 510 2304 11745
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 566 1317 7451 | 507 2332 11834
Tot: 537 1825 9643
Compression: 7592,7562,7451
Decompression: 11822,11787,11834
Total: 9707,9675,9643
##########################################################################
Testing clockspeeds again. System health now:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
18:22:58: 2400/2016MHz 5.88 98% 1% 96% 0% 0% 0% 35,6°C
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu0-cpu1 (Cortex-A53):
Cpufreq OPP: 2016 Measured: 2360 (2355.706/1688.289/2001.669)
Cpufreq OPP: 1908 Measured: 1885 (1882.252/1876.387/1898.479)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1795 (1792.615/1787.334/1876.584)
Cpufreq OPP: 1704 Measured: 1420 (1415.535/1788.206/1444.080)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1600 (1599.512/1599.175/1601.019)
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1490 (1487.588/1490.456/1482.005)
Cpufreq OPP: 1398 Measured: 1390 (1387.868/1387.659/1389.167)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 1200 (1196.038/1195.374/1195.913)
Cpufreq OPP: 1000 Measured: 1000 (1000.247/997.097/996.664)
Cpufreq OPP: 667 Measured: 665 (664.122/663.562/663.989)
Cpufreq OPP: 500 Measured: 500 (497.291/495.933/497.525)
Cpufreq OPP: 250 Measured: 250 (247.455/247.840/247.789)
Cpufreq OPP: 100 Measured: 100 (98.042/98.557/94.492)
Checking cpufreq OPP for cpu2-cpu5 (Cortex-A73):
Cpufreq OPP: 2400 Measured: 2395 (2394.474/2794.001/2094.826)
Cpufreq OPP: 2304 Measured: 1880 (1877.852/2298.815/2296.515)
Cpufreq OPP: 2208 Measured: 2205 (2204.942/1948.349/1486.176)
Cpufreq OPP: 2108 Measured: 2095 (2093.060/2093.485/1672.788)
Cpufreq OPP: 2016 Measured: 2010 (2010.220/2013.003/2012.902)
Cpufreq OPP: 1908 Measured: 1905 (1903.966/1904.550/1904.707)
Cpufreq OPP: 1800 Measured: 1800 (1798.407/1797.986/1798.307)
Cpufreq OPP: 1704 Measured: 1705 (1701.549/1701.782/1698.308)
Cpufreq OPP: 1608 Measured: 1330 (1330.633/1602.251/1603.982)
Cpufreq OPP: 1512 Measured: 1500 (1495.340/1496.449/738.904)
Cpufreq OPP: 1398 Measured: 1395 (1392.462/1314.500/1069.902)
Cpufreq OPP: 1200 Measured: 855 (854.457/1103.028/916.571)
Cpufreq OPP: 1000 Measured: 480 (475.385/1164.913/997.446)
Cpufreq OPP: 667 Measured: 665 (664.984/665.325/665.492)
Cpufreq OPP: 500 Measured: 500 (499.027/388.492/498.257)
Cpufreq OPP: 250 Measured: 380 (376.751/248.377/248.934)
Cpufreq OPP: 100 Measured: 70 (68.226/98.180/98.920)
##########################################################################
Thermal source: /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0/ (cpu_thermal)
System health while running tinymembench:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
18:04:13: 2400/2016MHz 0.62 5% 1% 3% 0% 0% 0% 26,0°C
18:05:33: 2400/2016MHz 0.90 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 26,2°C
18:06:53: 2400/2016MHz 0.98 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 25,6°C
18:08:14: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 25,8°C
18:09:34: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 26,1°C
18:10:54: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 28,9°C
18:12:14: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,5°C
18:13:34: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,6°C
18:14:54: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,6°C
System health while running OpenSSL benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
18:15:25: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 12% 0% 11% 0% 0% 0% 28,6°C
18:15:41: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,1°C
18:15:57: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,2°C
18:16:13: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,3°C
18:16:29: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,6°C
18:16:45: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,5°C
18:17:01: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,8°C
System health while running 7-zip single core benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
18:17:13: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 12% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 31,2°C
18:17:20: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 17% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,7°C
18:17:27: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,5°C
18:17:34: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,4°C
18:17:41: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,4°C
18:17:48: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,4°C
18:17:55: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,4°C
18:18:02: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,4°C
18:18:09: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,5°C
18:18:17: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,6°C
18:18:24: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,6°C
18:18:31: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,5°C
18:18:38: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,5°C
18:18:45: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,5°C
18:18:52: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 27,8°C
18:18:59: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,2°C
18:19:06: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,3°C
18:19:13: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,3°C
18:19:20: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,3°C
18:19:27: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,3°C
18:19:34: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,3°C
18:19:41: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,3°C
18:19:48: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 16% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 29,3°C
System health while running 7-zip multi core benchmark:
Time big.LITTLE load %cpu %sys %usr %nice %io %irq Temp
18:19:52: 2400/2016MHz 1.00 13% 0% 12% 0% 0% 0% 31,0°C
18:20:04: 2400/2016MHz 1.92 94% 0% 93% 0% 0% 0% 42,4°C
18:20:17: 2400/2016MHz 2.47 87% 0% 86% 0% 0% 0% 42,2°C
18:20:30: 2400/2016MHz 2.80 84% 1% 82% 0% 0% 0% 41,4°C
18:20:40: 2400/2016MHz 3.42 80% 1% 79% 0% 0% 0% 37,2°C
18:20:53: 2400/2016MHz 4.12 98% 1% 96% 0% 0% 0% 41,1°C
18:21:07: 2400/2016MHz 4.32 80% 0% 79% 0% 0% 0% 41,3°C
18:21:22: 2400/2016MHz 4.91 88% 0% 87% 0% 0% 0% 40,9°C
18:21:35: 2400/2016MHz 5.10 85% 0% 84% 0% 0% 0% 40,2°C
18:21:47: 2400/2016MHz 5.24 82% 1% 80% 0% 0% 0% 36,8°C
18:22:00: 2400/2016MHz 5.51 97% 1% 95% 0% 0% 0% 40,6°C
18:22:14: 2400/2016MHz 5.40 88% 0% 87% 0% 0% 0% 40,9°C
18:22:26: 2400/2016MHz 5.67 88% 0% 86% 0% 0% 0% 40,7°C
18:22:38: 2400/2016MHz 5.51 83% 1% 82% 0% 0% 0% 39,7°C
18:22:48: 2400/2016MHz 5.69 78% 0% 76% 0% 0% 0% 35,6°C
18:22:58: 2400/2016MHz 5.88 98% 1% 96% 0% 0% 0% 35,6°C
##########################################################################
Linux 5.10.81-meson64 (nas003) 28.02.2022 _aarch64_ (6 CPU)
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
23,38 0,01 0,74 0,03 0,00 75,85
Device tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd
mmcblk1 6,68 291,39 152,77 0,00 442749 232120 0
mmcblk1boot0 0,04 0,15 0,00 0,00 232 0 0
mmcblk1boot1 0,04 0,15 0,00 0,00 232 0 0
zram0 0,37 1,50 0,00 0,00 2272 4 0
zram1 0,16 0,31 1,28 0,00 476 1948 0
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3,7Gi 255Mi 3,3Gi 10Mi 202Mi 3,4Gi
Swap: 1,9Gi 0B 1,9Gi
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/zram0 partition 1953764 0 5
CPU sysfs topology (clusters, cpufreq members, clockspeeds)
cpufreq min max
CPU cluster policy speed speed core type
0 0 0 100 2016 Cortex-A53 / r0p4
1 0 0 100 2016 Cortex-A53 / r0p4
2 1 2 100 2208 Cortex-A73 / r0p2
3 1 2 100 2208 Cortex-A73 / r0p2
4 1 2 100 2208 Cortex-A73 / r0p2
5 1 2 100 2208 Cortex-A73 / r0p2
Architecture: aarch64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 6
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-5
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 3
Socket(s): 2
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: ARM
Model: 4
Model name: Cortex-A53
Stepping: r0p4
CPU max MHz: 2400,0000
CPU min MHz: 100,0000
BogoMIPS: 48.00
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-5
Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected
Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected
Vulnerability Mds: Not affected
Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected
Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Vulnerable
Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; __user pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2: Vulnerable
Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected
Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
Flags: fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 cpuid
SoC guess: Amlogic Meson G12B (S922X) Revision 29:c (40:2)
Compiler: /usr/bin/gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04/aarch64-linux-gnu)
Userland: arm64
Kernel: 5.10.81-meson64/aarch64
CONFIG_HZ=250
CONFIG_HZ_250=y
CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
raid6: neonx8 gen() 2786 MB/s
raid6: neonx8 xor() 2041 MB/s
raid6: neonx4 gen() 3006 MB/s
raid6: neonx4 xor() 2345 MB/s
raid6: neonx2 gen() 2577 MB/s
raid6: neonx2 xor() 2144 MB/s
raid6: neonx1 gen() 1961 MB/s
raid6: neonx1 xor() 1721 MB/s
raid6: int64x8 gen() 1374 MB/s
raid6: int64x8 xor() 735 MB/s
raid6: int64x4 gen() 1462 MB/s
raid6: int64x4 xor() 733 MB/s
raid6: int64x2 gen() 1361 MB/s
raid6: int64x2 xor() 619 MB/s
raid6: int64x1 gen() 1126 MB/s
raid6: int64x1 xor() 462 MB/s
raid6: using algorithm neonx4 gen() 3006 MB/s
raid6: .... xor() 2345 MB/s, rmw enabled
raid6: using neon recovery algorithm
xor: measuring software checksum speed
xor: using function: 32regs (4023 MB/sec)
| Hardkernel ODROID-N2Plus | 2400/2016 MHz | 5.10 | Focal arm64 | 9680 | 275730 | 1153830 | 4030 | 7120 | - |