Discuss removing suppression for settersHaveSinceTag

[stoyanK7]

In checkstyle/checkstyle#13455 we add a MatchXPath check to ensure that all property setters have a @since property in their Javadoc. For example

/**
...
@since 1.1
*/
public final void setSomething() ..

In #1023 we add a suppression for all checks in this repository because the CI in checkstyle repo is failing
https://checkstyle.semaphoreci.com/jobs/b80149c4-f163-4908-a4ab-98a19bcb625e

ERROR] [checkstyle] [ERROR] /home/semaphore/checkstyle/.ci-temp/sevntu.checkstyle/sevntu-checks/src/main/java/com/github/sevntu/checkstyle/checks/annotation/ForbidAnnotationCheck.java:66:5: All property setters of a module should contain a @since tag. [[ERROR] /home/semaphore/checkstyle/.ci-temp/sevntu.checkstyle/sevntu-checks/config/ant-phase-verify.xml:116: Checkstyle failed: Got 115 errors and 0 warnings.] 01:07
[ERROR] [checkstyle] [ERROR] /home/semaphore/checkstyle/.ci-temp/sevntu.checkstyle/sevntu-checks/src/main/java/com/github/sevntu/checkstyle/checks/annotation/ForbidAnnotationCheck.java:79:5: All property setters of a module should contain a @since tag. [settersHaveSinceTag]
...
[ERROR] /home/semaphore/checkstyle/.ci-temp/sevntu.checkstyle/sevntu-checks/config/ant-phase-verify.xml:116: Checkstyle failed: Got 115 errors and 0 warnings.

I am not sure if we want to add those @sinces in this project or if it's possible. The purpose of this issue is to add an until ... on the line above the suppression of this check and discuss potentially removing it in the future

[nrmancuso]

I think it is reasonable to add such tags to property setters anywhere really, let's see what others think.

[rnveach]

I don't believe this repo has those things documented, so it will be regression hunting to identify all the versions to add. The custom branch I used referenced in the main repo's issue should be able to be used for this.

I am fine with this being done.

[romani]

This repo don't need this metadata for now, if we have time in future we will do this