You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I actually like having the placeholder "source" in the list - I think it helps hammer home that this is a unit that we've created to have the hierarchy represented. I say keep it :)
Should we improve the message so it makes more sense as a "Title"? Something like:
"Placeholder source: The datapoint to which this source is applied is a placeholder. This means that it represents a link in the hierarchical structure of this branch of the security or defence force for which Security Force Monitor does not have a direct source but research shows is likely to exist."
In two scenarios, we create "placeholder" units:
Here, for example:
We handle sourcing for these units using a dummy source (access point ID:
f93f5cb7-0e67-4b70-863f-c91c783988c3
):There are a couple of other dummy sources too, which handle different cases.
I don't think these needs to appear in the "sources" table for each record. @tonysecurityforcemonitor - what's your take on this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: